Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

STENA VINGA

IMO
9323699
Type
Ro-pax ship
Port of registry
Gothenburg
Technical efficiency
EEXI 30.80 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Stena Line Scandinavia AB · part of Stena

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
95.5 kg/nm
Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (−36%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
1,318
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (+133%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
545
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+115%)
Average speed
13.3 kn
Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−16%)
Fuel per day at sea
30.4 t/day
Fuel consumed
733 t
CO₂ emitted
2,296 t
2,332 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
7,669 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
579 h
24 days, 7% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 95.5 kg/nm · median 150.2 (−36%)
69.3Ranks 89 of 408, lowest first232.4
Average speedThis ship 13.3 kn · median 15.8 (−16%)
12.0Faster than 20% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,318.13 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (+133%)
66.76Ranks 345 of 408, lowest first1,568.87
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 544.83 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (+115%)
48.59Ranks 282 of 408, lowest first1,247.19
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports64%
  • From the EU25%
  • Into the EU7%
  • At berth in the EU4%

84% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,929 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
4.5%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.0 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • STENA VINGA
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • STENA VINGA
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • STENA VINGA
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • STENA VINGA
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025+0.5 kn−8%−5%−63%+38%0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−0.7 kn+4%−1%−54%−33%0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023−2.2 kn+17%+1%−37%+10%2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+1.1 kn+5%+12%+2%−24%1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−0.9 kn−9%−14%+55%+23%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020+1.6 kn+7%+20%−11%+60%1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−1.5 kn−16%−24%−21%+53%1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025Stena Line Scandinavia AB7332,2967,66957913.395.5––
2024Stena Line Scandinavia AB2,1516,75120,6851,61912.8104.0––
2023not published4,45713,95944,7323,30813.599.6––
2022not published6,10219,19671,5624,57115.785.3––
2021not published5,68417,74770,1224,78914.681.1––
2020not published4,04512,66245,3152,91615.589.3––
2019not published4,24513,32750,9803,68013.983.3––
2018not published6,35719,86564,2344,16915.499.0––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025Stena Line Scandinavia AB1,318.13566.51+133%345 of 408544.83253.18+115%DNVC
2024Stena Line Scandinavia AB955.74546.68+75%282 of 404293.17232.85+26%DNVC
2023not published1,428.74680.04+110%335 of 386331.25233.94+42%DNVC
2022not published1,300.41626.32+108%334 of 394181.35252.90−28%DNVC
2021not published1,717.04815.19+111%322 of 377141.19226.00−38%DNVC
2020not published1,391.45750.91+85%273 of 387200.96217.49−8%Lloyd's RegisterC
2019not published870.37569.03+53%252 of 394154.20222.56−31%Lloyd's Register–
2018not published567.46728.92−22%158 of 361173.09184.05−6%Lloyd's RegisterC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

STENA VINGA (IMO 9323699): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2025 | Navalyze