Navalyze · Container · Ship

OOCL KOBE

IMO: 9329526
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 27,769 t
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.80 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 27,901 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

155

Container median 165 kg/nm (−6%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

17.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−10%)

Average speed

13.2 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (+0%)

Fuel per day at sea

49.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,593 t

CO₂ emitted

33,176 t

Distance sailed

68,257 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,177 h

216 days, 59% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 152 kg/nm · median 177 (−14%)

78.8Ranks 936 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.6 kn · median 13.3 (−5%)

9.1Faster than 39% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 17.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+4%)

7.22Ranks 1,159 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports42%
From the EU45%
Into the EU10%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

10,286 t

97% of all fuel; 3% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

989 t

3.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

OOCL KOBE
Container median

150.0160.0170.0180.0190.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

OOCL KOBE
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

OOCL KOBE
Container median

16.018.020.022.024.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	−5%	−7%	−5%	+6%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	+3%	+0%	+6%	−8%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	−10%	−15%	−4%	−14%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.3 kn	+1%	+2%	−7%	+19%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	−2%	−3%	−9%	−10%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	−1%	−4%	−4%	−6%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.4 kn	−3%	−11%	+5%	−9%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	10,381	32,270	68,319	5,418	12.6	152	17.0	97%
2024	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	11,568	36,076	72,084	5,638	12.8	161	16.0	97%
2023	not published	10,593	33,176	68,257	5,177	13.2	155	17.4	97%
2022	not published	12,319	38,640	71,206	5,129	13.9	173	20.2	97%
2021	not published	13,186	41,326	76,619	5,628	13.6	172	16.9	97%
2020	not published	14,796	46,388	84,413	6,099	13.8	175	18.8	–
2019	not published	15,583	48,859	88,286	6,156	14.3	177	20.1	–
2018	not published	15,306	47,890	84,322	5,356	15.7	182	22.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	17.0	16.3	+4%	1,159 of 2,208	ABS	A+C
2024	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	16.0	17.5	−9%	890 of 1,974	ABS	A+B+C
2023	not published	17.4	19.4	−10%	843 of 1,899	ABS	B+C
2022	not published	20.2	19.1	+5%	951 of 1,825	ABS	B+C
2021	not published	16.9	17.9	−6%	834 of 1,781	ABS	B+C
2020	not published	18.8	17.6	+7%	958 of 1,797	ABS	B+C
2019	not published	20.1	18.9	+6%	964 of 1,788	ABS	B+C
2018	not published	22.0	20.2	+9%	939 of 1,705	ABS	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.