Navalyze · Container · Ship

PACIFIC DALIAN

IMO: 9339090
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 2,550 t
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 30.66 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Columbia Shipmanagement (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. · part of Columbia Shipmanagement

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,550 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

75.2 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−58%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

93.41

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+473%)

Average speed

10.7 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−20%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,851 t

CO₂ emitted

5,867 t

5,957 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

24,628 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,306 h

96 days, 26% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 75.2 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−58%)

78.8Ranks 170 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 10.7 kn · median 13.3 (−20%)

9.1Faster than 19% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 93.41 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+473%)

7.22Ranks 2,206 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports24%
From the EU36%
Into the EU36%
At berth in the EU4%

64% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,753 t).

Fuel burned laden

86%

14% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

4.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

PACIFIC DALIAN
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PACIFIC DALIAN
Container median

2.55.07.510.012.515.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PACIFIC DALIAN
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0100

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.2 kn	+9%	−2%	−35%	+39%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.6 kn	+3%	−2%	−21%	−12%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	−15%	−19%	−9%	−13%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+13%	+12%	+96%	+31%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.5 kn	−6%	+6%	−12%	+45%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+7.0 kn	−3%	+145%	+590%	−29%	7.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Columbia Shipmanagement (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.	1,851	5,867	24,628	2,306	10.7	75.2	93.41	86%
2024	Columbia Shipmanagement-GEU	2,636	8,269	38,094	3,208	11.9	69.2	67.42	95%
2023	not published	3,218	10,068	48,119	3,843	12.5	66.9	76.66	87%
2022	not published	4,148	12,953	52,776	4,025	13.1	78.6	87.65	88%
2021	not published	1,882	5,868	26,978	2,057	13.1	69.8	67.04	89%
2020	not published	2,272	7,100	30,525	2,625	11.6	74.4	46.32	–
2019	not published	341	1,072	4,423	961	4.6	77.0	64.83	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Columbia Shipmanagement (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.	93.41	16.30	+473%	2,206 of 2,208	ABS	A
2024	Columbia Shipmanagement-GEU	67.42	17.52	+285%	1,895 of 1,974	ABS	A
2023	not published	76.66	19.40	+295%	1,872 of 1,899	ABS	B
2022	not published	87.65	19.13	+358%	1,809 of 1,825	ABS	B
2021	not published	67.04	17.90	+275%	1,722 of 1,781	ABS	B
2020	not published	46.32	17.58	+163%	1,565 of 1,797	ABS	B
2019	not published	64.83	18.88	+243%	1,693 of 1,788	DNV	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.