Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

Columbia Shipmanagement (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.
Ships35
CO₂ emitted211 kt+5.0%
Fuel per mile84 kg/nm
Average speed10.7 kn
CO₂ at berth4.2%
Ships burning LNG0
Main segmentContainer

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Container

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3

  • Columbia Shipmanagement (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.43.1 (+164%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Columbia Shipmanagement (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.1343.1+164%9010.13,2243.5%–
Segment median 16.30%

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9

  • Columbia Shipmanagement (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.8.8 (+11%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Columbia Shipmanagement (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.138.8+11%7611.01,2196.3%–
Segment median 7.90%

General cargo

CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 25.5

  • Columbia Shipmanagement (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.65.0 (+155%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Columbia Shipmanagement (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.565.0+155%9112.71,6153.3%–
Segment median 25.50%

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0

  • Columbia Shipmanagement (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.33.3 (+319%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Columbia Shipmanagement (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.233.3+319%579.92,7416.2%–
Segment median 8.00%

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0

  • Columbia Shipmanagement (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.9.1 (−40%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Columbia Shipmanagement (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.19.1−40%8411.81,7209.5%–
Segment median 15.00%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
Columbia Shipmanagement (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.ABS (35)100%0%0%0%

Columbia Shipmanagement (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
AAL DAMPIER9521540General cargo251 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+887%12.03,425 t€112k
AAL KEMBLA9498353General cargo187 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+635%13.04,097 t€112k
AAL PUSAN9498389General cargo65.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+155%14.16,122 t€187k
LILSTELLA9794771Oil tanker59.7 g CO₂/t·nm27.1+120%9.57,626 t€265k
PACIFIC DALIAN9339090Container93.4 g CO₂/t·nm44.8+109%10.75,867 t€197k
AAL KOBE9498444General cargo46.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+84%12.45,825 t€177k
CAPE GRECO9481477Bulk carrier12.3 g CO₂/t·nm8.0+55%9.51,928 t€52k
CAPE KOURION9481441Bulk carrier9.1 g CO₂/t·nm6.6+38%11.03,253 t€89k
MDS APHRODITE9480708Bulk carrier11.7 g CO₂/t·nm9.5+24%10.74,082 t€0
ATLANTIC MERCHANT9378929Container55.4 g CO₂/t·nm44.8+24%5.05,539 t€216k
LADY J9957610Bulk carrier6.0 g CO₂/t·nm4.8+23%10.93,178 t€110k
CAPE BYRON9950090Container27.1 g CO₂/t·nm22.2+22%11.93,968 t€111k
AAL MELBOURNE9498456General cargo30.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+21%12.59,876 t€287k
ERNEST VINBERG9707649Bulk carrier9.5 g CO₂/t·nm8.0+19%9.62,333 t€75k
RIYADH MUKAAB9399806Container52.9 g CO₂/t·nm44.8+18%12.79,215 t€276k
ATLANTIC GENEVA9330848Container48.4 g CO₂/t·nm44.8+8%9.87,450 t€271k
CAPE FULMAR9359313Container45.1 g CO₂/t·nm44.8+1%4.85,315 t€140k
AURORA BOREALIS9957608Bulk carrier6.4 g CO₂/t·nm6.6−3%11.34,123 t€121k
BRIGHT STAR9481960Bulk carrier14.9 g CO₂/t·nm15.5−4%11.51,366 t€42k
ATLANTIC GREEN9354404Container41.0 g CO₂/t·nm44.8−8%10.313,833 t€710k
ATLANTIC EXPRESS9330850Container40.6 g CO₂/t·nm44.8−9%10.79,757 t€303k
MDS ATHENA9450674Bulk carrier8.5 g CO₂/t·nm9.5−10%11.73,413 t€74k
EMMY9956202Bulk carrier7.1 g CO₂/t·nm8.0−11%11.34,188 t€132k
VENTO DI BORA9950064Container19.6 g CO₂/t·nm22.2−12%12.010,719 t€409k
CAPE SABLE9950131Container18.5 g CO₂/t·nm22.2−17%14.721,155 t€588k
NORD VIRAGE9944132Chemical tanker9.1 g CO₂/t·nm11.5−21%11.85,367 t€173k
CAPE BILBAO1035052Oil tanker6.9 g CO₂/t·nm10.4−34%12.12,067 t€58k
CENTURION BUYO9975208Bulk carrier6.1 g CO₂/t·nm9.5−35%11.42,498 t€88k
SOFIA1060746Bulk carrier4.9 g CO₂/t·nm8.0−38%11.53,742 t€108k
MDS ARTEMIS9480710Bulk carrier9.5 g CO₂/t·nm15.5−39%10.74,625 t€62k

30 of 35 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.