Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

TRANS SOL

IMO: 9348936
Type: Container/ro-ro cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 1,884 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.51 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super
Former names: MISANA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Oy Trailer-Link AB

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 1,884 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

89.3 kg/nm

Ro-ro median 104.6 kg/nm (−15%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

149

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 95.19 (+57%)

Average speed

12.4 kn

Ro-ro median 14.4 kn (−14%)

Fuel per day at sea

26.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,602 t

CO₂ emitted

17,619 t

17,894 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

62,746 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,053 h

211 days, 58% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 89.3 kg/nm · median 104.6 (−15%)

56.6Ranks 64 of 235, lowest first145.3

Average speedThis ship 12.4 kn · median 14.4 (−14%)

10.9Faster than 22% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 149.01 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.19 (+57%)

47.35Ranks 161 of 235, lowest first297.27

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports97%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU3%

44% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (7,770 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Con-ro median is the middle ship of all con-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

TRANS SOL
Con-ro median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TRANS SOL
Con-ro median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

TRANS SOL
Con-ro median

0.050.0100150

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	−1%	+1%	−15%	+603%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	−5%	−8%	+1%	−9%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	+1%	+0%	+2%	+36%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	−1%	−3%	−2%	−4%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	−1%	+1%	+79%	−44%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	−1.2 kn	−12%	−19%	−28%	+104%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−1.7 kn	−4%	−15%	−2%	−4%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Oy Trailer-Link AB	3,123	9,849	34,689	2,783	12.5	90.0	–	–
2025	Stodig Ship Management AS	5,602	17,619	62,746	5,053	12.4	89.3	149.01	–
2024	Oy Trailer-Link AB	6,655	20,991	73,536	6,066	12.1	90.5	–	–
2023	not published	6,933	21,869	72,944	5,834	12.5	95.0	–	–
2022	not published	6,723	21,204	71,518	5,654	12.6	94.0	–	–
2021	not published	6,907	21,786	72,910	5,641	12.9	94.7	–	–
2020	not published	3,873	12,323	40,703	3,204	12.7	95.2	–	–
2019	not published	6,078	18,983	56,350	4,068	13.9	107.9	–	–
2018	not published	6,484	20,281	57,730	3,699	15.6	112.3	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Oy Trailer-Link AB	–	–	–	–	DNV	B
2025	Stodig Ship Management AS	149.01	95.19	+57%	161 of 235	DNV	B
2024	Oy Trailer-Link AB	21.21	9.36	+127%	54 of 64	DNV	B
2023	not published	23.25	8.42	+176%	54 of 56	DNV	B
2022	not published	17.09	7.68	+123%	54 of 59	DNV	B
2021	not published	17.85	8.10	+120%	51 of 62	DNV	B
2020	not published	32.11	8.53	+276%	57 of 69	DNV	B
2019	not published	15.71	9.58	+64%	47 of 67	DNV	B
2018	not published	16.35	11.58	+41%	51 of 65	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.