Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

TRANS HAV

IMO: 9348948
Type: Container/ro-ro cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 3,114 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.61 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super
Former names: MISIDA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Oy Trailer-Link AB

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

106

Con-ro median 127 kg/nm (−17%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

22.8

g CO₂/m³·nm · Con-ro median 8.53 (+167%)

Average speed

8.8 kn

Con-ro median 15.7 kn (−44%)

Fuel per day at sea

22.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,628 t

CO₂ emitted

17,668 t

Distance sailed

53,254 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,038 h

252 days, 69% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 92.2 kg/nm · median 105 (−12%)

56.6Ranks 81 of 235, lowest first145

Average speedThis ship 12.9 kn · median 14.4 (−10%)

10.9Faster than 28% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 92.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.2 (−3%)

47.4Ranks 116 of 235, lowest first297

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports75%
From the EU8%
Into the EU12%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

850 t

4.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Con-ro median is the middle ship of all con-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TRANS HAV
Con-ro median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TRANS HAV
Con-ro median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

TRANS HAV
Con-ro median

0.050.0100150

’182018’192019’202020’212021’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	+1%	+2%	−30%	+397%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	−1.0 kn	−3%	−10%	+2%	–	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.4 kn	−3%	−6%	+7%	–	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.9 kn	−7%	−12%	−12%	–	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+6.3 kn	−1%	+69%	+72%	+413%	6.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−6.3 kn	+3%	−40%	−7%	+72%	6.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	−4%	−8%	−6%	−14%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Oy Trailer-Link AB	2,076	6,544	21,972	1,641	13.4	94.5	–	–
2025	Stodig Ship Management AS	5,646	17,686	61,249	4,755	12.9	92.2	92.7	–
2024	Oy Trailer-Link AB	7,988	25,185	87,567	6,847	12.8	91.2	–	–
2023	not published	8,150	25,697	86,217	6,268	13.8	94.5	–	–
2022	not published	7,820	24,662	80,381	5,647	14.2	97.3	–	–
2021	not published	9,519	30,021	91,389	6,040	15.1	104	–	–
2020	not published	5,628	17,668	53,254	6,038	8.8	106	–	–
2019	not published	5,891	18,398	57,159	3,786	15.1	103	–	–
2018	not published	6,537	20,418	60,994	3,883	15.7	107	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Oy Trailer-Link AB	–	–	–	–	DNV	B
2025	Stodig Ship Management AS	92.7	95.2	−3%	116 of 235	DNV	B
2024	Oy Trailer-Link AB	18.6	9.36	+99%	53 of 64	DNV	B
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	B
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	B
2021	not published	117	8.10	+1,342%	62 of 62	DNV	B
2020	not published	22.8	8.53	+167%	55 of 69	DNV	B
2019	not published	13.3	9.58	+39%	46 of 67	DNV	B
2018	not published	15.5	11.6	+34%	50 of 65	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.