Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

FEMBRIA

IMO: 9350771
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.89 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Schiffahrtskontor tom Worden GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

44.6

General cargo median 55.9 kg/nm (−20%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

30.1

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 22.7 (+32%)

Average speed

10.3 kn

General cargo median 10.9 kn (−6%)

Fuel per day at sea

11.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,862 t

CO₂ emitted

5,968 t

Distance sailed

41,781 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,042 h

168 days, 46% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 41.1 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+17%)

17.4Ranks 1,609 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 9.5 kn · median 9.3 (+2%)

6.9Faster than 54% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 27.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+9%)

10.2Ranks 1,568 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports66%
From the EU19%
Into the EU9%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

350 t

5.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

FEMBRIA
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

FEMBRIA
General cargo median

9.09.510.010.511.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

FEMBRIA
General cargo median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	−7%	−10%	−3%	−15%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	+3%	−2%	−8%	+17%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.2 kn	−2%	+1%	+7%	−17%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	−1%	−5%	+3%	+12%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	+4%	+10%	−11%	−28%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	−7%	−7%	+1%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	−1%	−3%	−11%	+30%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Schiffahrtskontor tom Worden GmbH & Co. KG	1,693	5,427	41,178	4,333	9.5	41.1	–	–
2024	Schiffahrtskontor tom Worden GmbH & Co. KG	1,883	6,036	42,424	4,358	9.7	44.4	–	–
2023	not published	1,996	6,399	46,114	4,514	10.2	43.3	–	–
2022	not published	1,900	6,091	43,189	4,328	10.0	44.0	–	–
2021	not published	1,862	5,968	41,781	4,042	10.3	44.6	–	–
2020	not published	2,009	6,439	46,995	4,778	9.8	42.7	–	–
2019	not published	2,126	6,816	46,419	4,695	9.9	45.8	–	–
2018	not published	2,402	7,700	52,071	5,141	10.1	46.1	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Schiffahrtskontor tom Worden GmbH & Co. KG	27.8	25.5	+9%	1,568 of 2,723	DNV	A+C
2024	Schiffahrtskontor tom Worden GmbH & Co. KG	32.7	19.3	+70%	943 of 1,111	DNV	A
2023	not published	28.0	20.7	+35%	784 of 1,045	DNV	A
2022	not published	33.7	21.6	+56%	831 of 1,034	DNV	A
2021	not published	30.1	22.7	+32%	863 of 1,142	DNV	A
2020	not published	41.6	24.5	+70%	991 of 1,167	DNV	A
2019	not published	43.2	25.0	+73%	959 of 1,154	DNV	A
2018	not published	33.1	24.9	+33%	728 of 1,044	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.