Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

ORCHID KEFALONIA

IMO: 9363821
Type: Chemical tanker
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.77 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: AS ORELIA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: SYNERGY NAVIS MARINE PRIVATE LIMITED · part of Synergy Marine

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 12,969 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

83.6

Chemical tanker median 90.2 kg/nm (−7%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

20.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 17.1 (+18%)

Average speed

12.9 kn

Chemical tanker median 10.1 kn (+28%)

Fuel per day at sea

25.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,297 t

CO₂ emitted

7,208 t

Distance sailed

27,487 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,133 h

89 days, 24% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,314 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 61.7 kg/nm · median 81.9 (−25%)

55.0Ranks 244 of 1,314, lowest first115

Average speedThis ship 12.2 kn · median 11.2 (+9%)

9.1Faster than 81% of chemical tanker ships12.7

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.2 (−18%)

9.07Ranks 463 of 1,314, lowest first43.8

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports22%
From the EU28%
Into the EU34%
At berth in the EU16%

Fuel burned laden

1,516 t

66% of all fuel; 34% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,085 t

15.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ORCHID KEFALONIA
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

ORCHID KEFALONIA
Chemical tanker median

10.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ORCHID KEFALONIA
Chemical tanker median

10.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	−0.7 kn	+3%	−3%	+14%	–	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.9 kn	−11%	−3%	−18%	−12%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	−12%	−16%	+0%	−42%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2021	−0.2 kn	−25%	−26%	+195%	−24%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.9 kn	+25%	+17%	−73%	+71%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 25%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024	SYNERGY NAVIS MARINE PRIVATE LIMITED	1,313	4,109	20,618	1,796	11.5	63.7	–	–
2023	not published	1,117	3,532	18,098	1,479	12.2	61.7	13.3	–
2022	not published	1,521	4,809	22,006	1,954	11.3	69.1	15.2	–
2021	not published	1,728	5,443	21,952	1,867	11.8	78.7	26.1	–
2019	not published	780	2,455	7,434	620	12.0	105	34.5	53%
2018	not published	2,297	7,208	27,487	2,133	12.9	83.6	20.2	66%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	SYNERGY NAVIS MARINE PRIVATE LIMITED	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A
2023	not published	13.3	16.2	−18%	463 of 1,314	ClassNK	A
2022	not published	15.2	16.1	−6%	635 of 1,409	ClassNK	A
2021	not published	26.1	16.7	+56%	995 of 1,343	ClassNK	A
2019	not published	34.5	17.3	+99%	1,104 of 1,321	Bureau Veritas	C
2018	not published	20.2	17.1	+18%	810 of 1,294	Bureau Veritas	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.