Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

DE XIN HAI

IMO: 9364758
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 38,031 t
Flag (estimated): China
Port of registry: Hai Kou
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.60 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 39,979 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

74.1

Bulk carrier median 86.1 kg/nm (−14%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

5.83

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.27 (−30%)

Average speed

14.6 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.8 kn (+35%)

Fuel per day at sea

25.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,932 t

CO₂ emitted

6,072 t

Distance sailed

26,053 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,789 h

75 days, 20% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 97.5 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+18%)

61.0Ranks 2,806 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 11.0 kn · median 10.7 (+3%)

8.8Faster than 63% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.01 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+1%)

4.80Ranks 1,852 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU43%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

532 t

8.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

DE XIN HAI
Bulk carrier median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

DE XIN HAI
Bulk carrier median

10.012.014.016.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

DE XIN HAI
Bulk carrier median

4.05.06.07.08.09.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.8 kn	−15%	−9%	+1,815%	+33%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−4.4 kn	+55%	+8%	−97%	+3%	4.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 55%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+3.1 kn	+18%	+49%	+44%	+20%	3.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.3 kn	−38%	−36%	+227%	−20%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 38%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.9 kn	+7%	−0%	−79%	−7%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.7 kn	−27%	−23%	+878%	+0%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	1,604	5,010	16,446	1,500	11.0	97.5	8.01	–
2024	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	99	307	859	84	10.2	115	6.01	–
2023	not published	1,932	6,072	26,053	1,789	14.6	74.1	5.83	–
2022	not published	1,142	3,572	18,130	1,572	11.5	63.0	4.87	–
2021	not published	559	1,746	5,539	493	11.2	101	6.10	–
2020	not published	2,502	7,825	26,502	2,196	12.1	94.4	6.53	–
2019	not published	350	1,095	2,709	238	11.4	129	6.52	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	8.01	7.90	+1%	1,852 of 3,611	China Classification Society	A
2024	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	6.01	8.09	−26%	710 of 3,089	China Classification Society	A
2023	not published	5.83	8.27	−30%	685 of 3,548	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	4.87	8.71	−44%	341 of 3,968	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	6.10	8.57	−29%	624 of 3,466	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	6.53	8.24	−21%	835 of 3,150	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	6.52	8.38	−22%	887 of 3,360	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.