Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

VIKING XPRS

IMO: 9375654
Type: Ro-pax ship
Port of registry: Mariehamn
Technical efficiency: EEXI 21.00 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: VIKING LINE Abp

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

155.6 kg/nm

Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (+4%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

131

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (−77%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

248

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (−2%)

Average speed

17.8 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

66.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,550 t

CO₂ emitted

37,030 t

37,597 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

74,219 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,171 h

174 days, 48% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 155.6 kg/nm · median 150.2 (+4%)

69.3Ranks 223 of 408, lowest first232.4

Average speedThis ship 17.8 kn · median 15.8 (+13%)

12.0Faster than 68% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 130.70 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (−77%)

66.76Ranks 93 of 408, lowest first1,568.87

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 248.37 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (−2%)

48.59Ranks 202 of 408, lowest first1,247.19

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports91%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU9%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (37,030 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

8.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.6 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

VIKING XPRS
Ro-pax median

150.0160.0170.0180.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

VIKING XPRS
Ro-pax median

15.016.017.018.019.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

VIKING XPRS
Ro-pax median

100200300400500

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

VIKING XPRS
Ro-pax median

0.02004006008001,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	−6%	−7%	−5%	−0%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	+3%	+3%	+2%	−20%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	+1%	+1%	+1%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	+0.2 kn	+0%	+1%	−1%	−23%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	−8%	−4%	+39%	+4%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.2 kn	−1%	−7%	−26%	+52%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	−2%	−2%	+6%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	VIKING LINE Abp	11,550	37,030	74,219	4,171	17.8	155.6	–	–
2024	VIKING LINE AB	12,951	41,522	77,961	4,354	17.9	166.1	–	–
2023	not published	12,397	39,724	76,760	4,300	17.9	161.5	–	–
2022	not published	12,107	38,249	75,700	4,262	17.8	159.9	–	–
2021	not published	12,188	38,874	76,200	4,326	17.6	159.9	–	–
2020	not published	9,520	29,998	54,700	3,234	16.9	174.0	–	–
2019	not published	13,003	40,971	74,100	4,099	18.1	175.5	–	–
2018	not published	12,480	39,324	69,600	3,849	18.1	179.3	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	VIKING LINE Abp	130.70	566.51	−77%	93 of 408	248.37	253.18	−2%	Verifavia	C
2024	VIKING LINE AB	131.05	546.68	−76%	104 of 404	396.52	232.85	+70%	Verifavia	C
2023	not published	163.71	680.04	−76%	85 of 386	423.40	233.94	+81%	Verifavia	C
2022	not published	170.17	626.32	−73%	93 of 394	439.08	252.90	+74%	Verifavia	C
2021	not published	221.75	815.19	−73%	102 of 377	432.07	226.00	+91%	Verifavia	C
2020	not published	213.86	750.91	−72%	101 of 387	460.42	217.49	+112%	Verifavia	C
2019	not published	140.64	569.03	−75%	96 of 394	400.63	222.56	+80%	Verifavia	C
2018	not published	136.85	728.92	−81%	81 of 361	393.07	184.05	+114%	Verifavia	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.