Navalyze · Container · Ship

MICHEL A

IMO: 9379349
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 11,140 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 16.93 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S. · part of Arkas

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,841 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

83.6

Container median 182 kg/nm (−54%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

91.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+354%)

Average speed

11.5 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−17%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,817 t

CO₂ emitted

8,784 t

Distance sailed

33,703 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,938 h

122 days, 34% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 109 kg/nm · median 177 (−38%)

78.8Ranks 618 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 13.3 (−18%)

9.1Faster than 21% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 30.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+89%)

7.22Ranks 1,705 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU13%
Into the EU86%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

136 t

1.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MICHEL A
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MICHEL A
Container median

10.011.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MICHEL A
Container median

0.025.050.075.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+4%	+3%	−33%	−0%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	+0%	−2%	+77%	−15%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2023	+1.0 kn	−5%	+4%	+73%	+21%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.8 kn	+9%	+1%	−1%	−28%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.6 kn	+11%	+17%	−32%	−57%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	+10%	−0%	−23%	+6%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	3,941	12,360	36,056	3,313	10.9	109	30.8	–
2024	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	5,658	17,677	53,580	4,894	10.9	106	30.8	–
2023	not published	3,187	9,955	30,327	2,710	11.2	105	36.4	–
2021	not published	1,944	6,093	17,508	1,713	10.2	111	30.2	–
2020	not published	1,807	5,646	17,695	1,615	11.0	102	41.8	–
2019	not published	2,379	7,418	25,916	2,495	10.4	91.8	97.6	–
2018	not published	2,817	8,784	33,703	2,938	11.5	83.6	91.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	30.8	16.3	+89%	1,705 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	30.8	17.5	+76%	1,471 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	36.4	19.4	+88%	1,476 of 1,899	DNV	A
2021	not published	30.2	17.9	+69%	1,307 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	41.8	17.6	+138%	1,502 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	97.6	18.9	+417%	1,777 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	91.7	20.2	+354%	1,674 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.