Navalyze

Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

XIN AN PING

IMO
9406805
Type
Bulk carrier
Port of registry
Guangzhou
Technical efficiency
EEXI 4.21 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
AN PING

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD · part of COSCO Shipping

?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
–
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
–
g CO₂/t·nm
Average speed
–
Fuel per day at sea
–
Fuel consumed
0 t
CO₂ emitted
0 t
0 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
–
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
0 h
0 days, 0% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2020

Set against all 3,150 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 97.1 kg/nm · median 86.5 (+12%)
63.9Ranks 2,180 of 3,150, lowest first123.3
Average speedThis ship 10.8 kn · median 11.1 (−3%)
9.3Faster than 42% of bulk carrier ships12.3
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.27 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.24 (−24%)
5.13Ranks 731 of 3,150, lowest first14.62
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

The voyage split is not in this year's report.

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
–
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.0 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • XIN AN PING
  • Bulk carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • XIN AN PING
  • Bulk carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • XIN AN PING
  • Bulk carrier median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025–––––
2023→2024–––––
2021→2023–––––
2020→2021–––––
2019→2020–––––
2018→2019–––––

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD00–0––––
2024COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD00–0––––
2023not published00–0––––
2021not published00–0––––
2020not published5201,6435,35849410.897.16.27–
2019not published00–0––––
2018not published1,6225,08516,9801,45711.795.58.25–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmBulk carrier medianvs Bulk carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD––––China Classification SocietyA
2024COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD––––China Classification SocietyA
2023not published––––China Classification SocietyA
2021not published––––China Classification SocietyA
2020not published6.278.24−24%731 of 3,150China Classification SocietyA
2019not published––––China Classification SocietyA
2018not published8.258.50−3%1,597 of 3,384China Classification SocietyA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

XIN AN PING (IMO 9406805): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2025 | Navalyze