Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

AN CHANG

IMO: 9407861
Type: Bulk carrier
Flag (estimated): China
Port of registry: Guangzhou,China
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.21 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 28,741 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

90.0

Bulk carrier median 91.2 kg/nm (−1%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.78

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.38 (+17%)

Average speed

13.1 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.3 kn (+27%)

Fuel per day at sea

28.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,235 t

CO₂ emitted

3,858 t

Distance sailed

13,725 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,045 h

44 days, 12% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 85.6 kg/nm · median 84.6 (+1%)

61.8Ranks 1,597 of 3,089, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 12.0 kn · median 10.6 (+13%)

8.8Faster than 93% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.50 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (−20%)

4.85Ranks 890 of 3,089, lowest first15.8

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports13%
From the EU30%
Into the EU50%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

269 t

7.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AN CHANG
Bulk carrier median

60.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AN CHANG
Bulk carrier median

10.011.012.013.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AN CHANG
Bulk carrier median

6.07.08.09.010.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	–	–	–	–	–
2023→2024	–	–	–	–	–
2022→2023	–	–	–	–	–
2021→2022	+1.5 kn	−5%	+7%	−33%	+2%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.1 kn	+44%	+21%	+327%	−13%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 44%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	−23%	−22%	−68%	−8%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 23%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+2.9 kn	−24%	−2%	−52%	+7%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	1,760	5,514	20,558	1,714	12.0	85.6	6.50	–
2023	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2022	not published	1,216	3,799	12,777	1,014	12.6	95.2	7.98	–
2021	not published	1,899	5,938	18,960	1,703	11.1	100	7.82	–
2020	not published	310	969	4,442	337	13.2	69.7	8.99	–
2019	not published	1,235	3,858	13,725	1,045	13.1	90.0	9.78	–
2018	not published	3,400	10,615	28,786	2,813	10.2	118	9.17	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2024	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	6.50	8.09	−20%	890 of 3,089	China Classification Society	A
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	7.98	8.71	−8%	1,623 of 3,968	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	7.82	8.57	−9%	1,376 of 3,466	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	8.99	8.24	+9%	1,859 of 3,150	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	9.78	8.38	+17%	2,184 of 3,360	China Classification Society	A
2018	not published	9.17	8.50	+8%	1,936 of 3,384	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.