Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

XIN AN YUAN

IMO: 9407873
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 34,790 t
Flag (estimated): China
Port of registry: Guangzhou
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.21 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: AN YUAN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 35,052 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

88.2

Bulk carrier median 90.8 kg/nm (−3%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.88

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.71 (−10%)

Average speed

12.8 kn

Bulk carrier median 11.1 kn (+15%)

Fuel per day at sea

27.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,193 t

CO₂ emitted

3,735 t

Distance sailed

13,522 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,054 h

44 days, 12% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 80.6 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−2%)

61.0Ranks 1,665 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 10.7 (+2%)

8.8Faster than 61% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.30 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (−8%)

4.80Ranks 1,531 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU33%
Into the EU58%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

86 t

2.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

XIN AN YUAN
Bulk carrier median

80.085.090.095.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

XIN AN YUAN
Bulk carrier median

10.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

XIN AN YUAN
Bulk carrier median

7.07.58.08.59.09.5

’182018’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.4 kn	−9%	−19%	+87%	−20%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	−1%	+1%	−20%	+9%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	+1%	−5%	−20%	+6%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.9 kn	−12%	−5%	−47%	−11%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	–	–	–	–	–
2019→2020	–	–	–	–	–
2018→2019	–	–	–	–	–

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	1,307	4,120	16,221	1,485	10.9	80.6	7.30	–
2024	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	766	2,392	8,677	705	12.3	88.3	9.12	–
2023	not published	973	3,053	10,880	905	12.0	89.4	8.34	–
2022	not published	1,193	3,735	13,522	1,054	12.8	88.2	7.88	–
2021	not published	2,564	8,006	25,663	2,161	11.9	99.9	8.84	–
2020	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2019	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2018	not published	1,922	6,011	21,685	1,774	12.2	88.7	8.50	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	7.30	7.90	−8%	1,531 of 3,611	China Classification Society	A
2024	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	9.12	8.09	+13%	1,890 of 3,089	China Classification Society	A
2023	not published	8.34	8.27	+1%	1,802 of 3,548	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	7.88	8.71	−10%	1,571 of 3,968	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	8.84	8.57	+3%	1,851 of 3,466	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2018	not published	8.50	8.50	+0%	1,692 of 3,384	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.