Navalyze · Container · Ship

WANDA A

IMO: 9415947
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 10,919 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.44 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S. · part of Arkas

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 11,399 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

88.0

Container median 172 kg/nm (−49%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

24.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (+37%)

Average speed

12.5 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (−11%)

Fuel per day at sea

26.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,846 t

CO₂ emitted

12,003 t

Distance sailed

43,710 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,508 h

146 days, 40% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 86.6 kg/nm · median 177 (−51%)

78.8Ranks 360 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.1 kn · median 13.3 (−9%)

9.1Faster than 31% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 24.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+52%)

7.22Ranks 1,552 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports10%
From the EU47%
Into the EU39%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

480 t

4.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

WANDA A
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

WANDA A
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

WANDA A
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.7 kn	−20%	−15%	+59%	−9%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.8 kn	+6%	−2%	−53%	+10%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	+3%	+4%	−11%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.7 kn	+7%	+1%	−2%	+4%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+5%	+9%	+43%	−2%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+2.7 kn	−3%	+24%	+42%	−60%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.3 kn	+1%	−11%	−2%	−35%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	3,471	10,816	40,070	3,317	12.1	86.6	24.7	–
2024	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	2,742	8,549	25,194	2,214	11.4	109	27.2	–
2023	not published	5,584	17,408	54,162	4,440	12.2	103	24.8	–
2022	not published	6,061	18,902	60,823	5,027	12.1	99.7	24.5	–
2021	not published	5,784	18,037	62,329	4,856	12.8	92.8	23.7	–
2020	not published	3,846	12,003	43,710	3,508	12.5	88.0	24.1	–
2019	not published	2,781	8,679	30,694	3,146	9.8	90.6	60.1	–
2018	not published	2,822	8,800	31,471	2,846	11.1	89.7	93.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	24.7	16.3	+52%	1,552 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	27.2	17.5	+55%	1,390 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	24.8	19.4	+28%	1,175 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	24.5	19.1	+28%	1,132 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	23.7	17.9	+32%	1,145 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	24.1	17.6	+37%	1,193 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	60.1	18.9	+218%	1,654 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	93.1	20.2	+360%	1,678 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.