Navalyze · Container · Ship

BERNARD A

IMO: 9415959
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 11,054 t
Flag (estimated): Turkiye
Port of registry: Izmir
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.44 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S. · part of Arkas

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 9,115 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

107

Container median 174 kg/nm (−38%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

36.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+95%)

Average speed

8.2 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (−40%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,038 t

CO₂ emitted

9,487 t

Distance sailed

28,311 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,444 h

144 days, 39% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 90.1 kg/nm · median 177 (−49%)

78.8Ranks 404 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.0 kn · median 13.3 (−17%)

9.1Faster than 22% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 25.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+57%)

7.22Ranks 1,579 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports16%
From the EU39%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

336 t

3.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BERNARD A
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BERNARD A
Container median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BERNARD A
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.6 kn	+7%	+24%	+1,799%	−12%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	−26%	−26%	−85%	−33%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.9 kn	+0%	+24%	+8%	+64%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.1 kn	+40%	+10%	+30%	−40%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 40%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.9 kn	+6%	−3%	−44%	+82%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.4 kn	−29%	−8%	−76%	−34%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 29%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.2 kn	+0%	−12%	+73%	+26%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	1,329	4,187	14,756	1,342	11.0	90.1	25.7	–
2024	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	66	207	777	82	9.4	84.5	29.0	–
2023	not published	593	1,874	5,223	551	9.5	114	43.7	–
2022	not published	550	1,724	4,842	635	7.6	114	26.6	–
2021	not published	303	954	3,736	385	9.7	81.2	44.4	–
2020	not published	510	1,595	6,669	631	10.6	76.4	24.4	–
2019	not published	3,038	9,487	28,311	3,444	8.2	107	36.8	–
2018	not published	1,752	5,466	16,399	1,738	9.4	107	29.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	25.7	16.3	+57%	1,579 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	29.0	17.5	+66%	1,433 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	43.7	19.4	+125%	1,593 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	26.6	19.1	+39%	1,205 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	44.4	17.9	+148%	1,533 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	24.4	17.6	+39%	1,202 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	36.8	18.9	+95%	1,375 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	29.1	20.2	+44%	1,153 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.