Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

SELECTA

IMO: 9424807
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.89 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: INTRESCO Ltd-UKE

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

38.7

General cargo median 55.9 kg/nm (−31%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

16.7

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 22.7 (−26%)

Average speed

9.2 kn

General cargo median 10.9 kn (−16%)

Fuel per day at sea

8.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,689 t

CO₂ emitted

5,349 t

Distance sailed

43,687 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,728 h

197 days, 54% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 45.2 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+28%)

17.4Ranks 1,762 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 9.1 kn · median 9.3 (−2%)

6.9Faster than 44% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 16.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−34%)

10.2Ranks 555 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU43%
Into the EU53%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

95 t

1.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SELECTA
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SELECTA
General cargo median

7.08.09.010.011.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

SELECTA
General cargo median

10.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	−2%	−4%	−33%	+15%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.7 kn	+1%	−6%	+14%	−24%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	+4%	−2%	+29%	+14%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.3 kn	+14%	+29%	−36%	+2%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	+10%	+6%	−14%	+4%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.9 kn	−21%	+0%	+98%	−11%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	−1%	−4%	−17%	−3%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	INTRESCO Ltd-UKE	1,233	3,912	27,311	3,009	9.1	45.2	–	–
2024	INTRESCO Ltd-UKE	1,892	5,981	40,955	4,441	9.2	46.2	–	–
2023	not published	1,641	5,184	35,831	3,623	9.9	45.8	–	–
2022	not published	1,229	3,892	27,841	2,647	10.5	44.1	–	–
2021	not published	1,689	5,349	43,687	4,728	9.2	38.7	–	–
2020	not published	1,787	5,664	50,730	5,326	9.5	35.2	–	–
2019	not published	1,136	3,570	25,603	3,375	7.6	44.4	–	17%
2018	not published	1,382	4,348	30,944	3,930	7.9	44.7	–	59%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	INTRESCO Ltd-UKE	16.8	25.5	−34%	555 of 2,723	Verifavia	A
2024	INTRESCO Ltd-UKE	14.7	19.3	−24%	390 of 1,111	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	19.4	20.7	−6%	470 of 1,045	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	17.1	21.6	−21%	326 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	16.7	22.7	−26%	284 of 1,142	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	16.0	24.5	−35%	211 of 1,167	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	18.0	25.0	−28%	264 of 1,154	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	18.6	24.9	−25%	287 of 1,044	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.