Navalyze · Container · Ship

PRAGUE EXPRESS

IMO: 9450399
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 48,113 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.68 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HL Crewmanagement GmbH

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 56,938 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

230

Container median 165 kg/nm (+39%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

12.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−36%)

Average speed

15.3 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (+16%)

Fuel per day at sea

84.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,986 t

CO₂ emitted

24,752 t

Distance sailed

34,777 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,279 h

95 days, 26% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 232 kg/nm · median 177 (+31%)

78.8Ranks 1,510 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 17.6 kn · median 13.3 (+32%)

9.1Faster than 98% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−8%)

7.22Ranks 1,016 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports30%
From the EU40%
Into the EU26%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

926 t

3.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PRAGUE EXPRESS
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PRAGUE EXPRESS
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PRAGUE EXPRESS
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.6 kn	+6%	+17%	−88%	+35%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.7 kn	−5%	−1%	+161%	−11%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.6 kn	−4%	+7%	+59%	+12%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+1%	+1%	+65%	+6%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2021	−0.5 kn	−14%	−17%	+195%	−19%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	+11%	+5%	−44%	−1%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	HL Crewmanagement GmbH	2,486	7,754	10,716	610	17.6	232	15.0	–
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	2,486	7,754	10,716	610	17.6	232	15.0	–
2024part-year	Hapag-Lloyd AG	9,401	29,355	43,070	2,708	15.9	218	10.1	–
2024	HL Crewmanagement GmbH	19,846	61,971	90,898	5,697	16.0	218	11.2	–
2023	not published	7,986	24,752	34,777	2,279	15.3	230	12.5	–
2022	not published	5,248	16,496	21,843	1,596	13.7	240	11.1	–
2021	not published	3,157	9,940	13,206	965	13.7	239	10.5	–
2019	not published	1,250	3,899	4,482	316	14.2	279	12.9	–
2018	not published	2,027	6,329	8,046	537	15.0	252	13.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	HL Crewmanagement GmbH	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	15.0	16.3	−8%	1,016 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024part-year	Hapag-Lloyd AG	–	–	–	–	DNV	B
2024	HL Crewmanagement GmbH	11.2	17.5	−36%	537 of 1,974	DNV	B
2023	not published	12.5	19.4	−36%	570 of 1,899	DNV	B
2022	not published	11.1	19.1	−42%	414 of 1,825	DNV	B
2021	not published	10.5	17.9	−42%	358 of 1,781	DNV	B
2019	not published	12.9	18.9	−32%	499 of 1,788	DNV	B
2018	not published	13.0	20.2	−36%	428 of 1,705	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.