Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM AFRICA ONE

IMO: 9451915
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 37,692 t
Flag (estimated): Bahamas
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.80 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Oil blended with biofuel or another alternative fuel

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 29,514 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

175

Container median 172 kg/nm (+2%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

18.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (+6%)

Average speed

12.2 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (−13%)

Fuel per day at sea

51.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,370 t

CO₂ emitted

29,533 t

Distance sailed

53,510 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,372 h

182 days, 50% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 204 kg/nm · median 177 (+15%)

78.8Ranks 1,303 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.0 kn · median 13.3 (−17%)

9.1Faster than 22% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 16.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+2%)

7.22Ranks 1,126 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports27%
From the EU38%
Into the EU26%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

9,370 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2,546 t

8.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM AFRICA ONE
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM AFRICA ONE
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM AFRICA ONE
Container median

12.515.017.520.022.525.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.0 kn	+16%	−1%	−37%	+14%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2024	−0.9 kn	+2%	−5%	+362%	−17%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	+6%	+6%	−53%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.8 kn	−8%	+5%	−67%	−5%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	+1%	−3%	−3%	+22%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	−0%	−5%	−4%	−35%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-yearBio blend	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	5,023	15,369	24,578	2,226	11.0	204	16.6	98%
2025Bio blend	CMA CGM SA	5,023	15,369	24,578	2,226	11.0	204	16.6	98%
2024Bio blend	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	6,866	21,222	39,122	3,009	13.0	176	14.5	98%
2022	not published	1,452	4,515	8,473	607	13.9	171	17.5	97%
2021	not published	2,891	9,110	17,850	1,279	14.0	162	17.7	97%
2020	not published	9,370	29,533	53,510	4,372	12.2	175	18.7	100%
2019	not published	9,575	29,921	55,171	4,350	12.7	174	15.3	93%
2018	not published	9,993	31,212	57,550	4,326	13.3	174	23.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-yearBio blend	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	–	–	–	–	ABS	C
2025Bio blend	CMA CGM SA	16.6	16.3	+2%	1,126 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024Bio blend	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	14.5	17.5	−17%	788 of 1,974	ABS	C
2022	not published	17.5	19.1	−9%	834 of 1,825	ABS	B+C
2021	not published	17.7	17.9	−1%	883 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	18.7	17.6	+6%	951 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	15.3	18.9	−19%	679 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	23.4	20.2	+16%	987 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.