Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM AFRICA TWO

IMO: 9451927
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 37,146 t
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.80 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 37,146 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

198.7 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+12%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

16.44

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+1%)

Average speed

11.6 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−13%)

Fuel per day at sea

55.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,253 t

CO₂ emitted

16,141 t

16,399 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

26,431 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,277 h

95 days, 26% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 198.7 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+12%)

78.8Ranks 1,265 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 11.6 kn · median 13.3 (−13%)

9.1Faster than 27% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 16.44 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+1%)

7.22Ranks 1,115 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU28%
Into the EU71%
At berth in the EU1%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden

99%

2% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CMA CGM AFRICA TWO
Container median

140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM AFRICA TWO
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM AFRICA TWO
Container median

10.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−2.2 kn	+28%	+7%	−23%	+26%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 28%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.2 kn	+11%	+22%	−11%	+6%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.1 kn	−13%	−20%	+6%	−24%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−1.9 kn	−1%	−13%	+57%	−15%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+3.2 kn	−7%	+17%	−49%	+0%	3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.3 kn	−1%	−3%	−21%	+21%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	−1%	−1%	+13%	−39%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	5,253	16,141	26,431	2,277	11.6	198.7	16.44	99%
2025	CMA CGM SA	5,253	16,141	26,431	2,277	11.6	198.7	16.44	99%
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	5,341	16,521	34,299	2,477	13.8	155.7	13.06	98%
2023LNG	not published	5,393	15,861	38,354	3,055	12.6	140.6	12.28	99%
2022	not published	5,839	18,160	36,093	2,627	13.7	161.8	16.09	98%
2021	not published	3,756	11,836	22,966	1,470	15.6	163.6	19.02	98%
2020	not published	7,978	25,158	45,438	3,650	12.4	175.6	18.97	100%
2019	not published	10,171	31,782	57,522	4,519	12.7	176.8	15.74	94%
2018	not published	9,136	28,541	50,996	4,008	12.7	179.2	25.88	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	–	–	–	–	ABS	C
2025	CMA CGM SA	16.44	16.30	+1%	1,115 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	13.06	17.52	−25%	691 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023LNG	not published	12.28	19.40	−37%	551 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	16.09	19.13	−16%	774 of 1,825	ABS	A+C
2021	not published	19.02	17.90	+6%	939 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	18.97	17.58	+8%	970 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	15.74	18.88	−17%	699 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	25.88	20.22	+28%	1,066 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.