Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM AFRICA THREE

IMO: 9451939
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 37,599 t
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.80 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 37,599 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

190.8 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+8%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.55

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−5%)

Average speed

11.8 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−11%)

Fuel per day at sea

54.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,322 t

CO₂ emitted

13,239 t

13,451 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

22,644 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,917 h

80 days, 22% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 190.8 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+8%)

78.8Ranks 1,217 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 11.8 kn · median 13.3 (−11%)

9.1Faster than 29% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.55 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−5%)

7.22Ranks 1,051 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU34%
Into the EU64%
At berth in the EU2%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden

97%

3% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CMA CGM AFRICA THREE
Container median

140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM AFRICA THREE
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM AFRICA THREE
Container median

10.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.8 kn	+11%	−3%	−38%	+0%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	+16%	+12%	+7%	+29%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	−12%	−16%	+60%	−12%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.9 kn	+3%	−3%	+47%	−30%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+3.4 kn	−1%	+26%	−68%	+12%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	−10%	−13%	−18%	−17%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	+7%	+5%	−0%	−14%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	4,322	13,239	22,644	1,917	11.8	190.8	15.55	97%
2025	CMA CGM SA	4,322	13,239	22,644	1,917	11.8	190.8	15.55	97%
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	6,298	19,559	36,722	2,709	13.6	171.5	15.49	98%
2023LNG	not published	5,058	14,647	34,224	2,441	14.0	147.8	12.03	98%
2022	not published	3,611	11,231	21,406	1,460	14.7	168.7	13.62	98%
2021	not published	2,383	7,509	14,578	933	15.6	163.5	19.56	98%
2020	not published	7,559	23,823	45,687	3,734	12.2	165.5	17.44	–
2019	not published	10,300	32,177	55,974	4,410	12.7	184.0	21.05	94%
2018	not published	9,660	30,166	56,181	4,345	12.9	171.9	24.50	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	–	–	–	–	ABS	C
2025	CMA CGM SA	15.55	16.30	−5%	1,051 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	15.49	17.52	−12%	849 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023LNG	not published	12.03	19.40	−38%	537 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	13.62	19.13	−29%	610 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	19.56	17.90	+9%	971 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	17.44	17.58	−1%	882 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	21.05	18.88	+11%	1,005 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	24.50	20.22	+21%	1,028 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.