Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM AFRICA THREE

IMO: 9451939
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 37,599 t
Flag (estimated): Bahamas
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.80 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Oil blended with biofuel or another alternative fuel

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 27,309 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

184

Container median 174 kg/nm (+6%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

21.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+11%)

Average speed

12.7 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

56.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,300 t

CO₂ emitted

32,177 t

Distance sailed

55,974 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,410 h

184 days, 50% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 191 kg/nm · median 177 (+8%)

78.8Ranks 1,217 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.8 kn · median 13.3 (−11%)

9.1Faster than 29% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−5%)

7.22Ranks 1,051 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports27%
From the EU35%
Into the EU32%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

9,641 t

94% of all fuel; 6% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2,082 t

6.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM AFRICA THREE
Container median

140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM AFRICA THREE
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM AFRICA THREE
Container median

10.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.8 kn	+11%	−3%	−38%	+0%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	+16%	+12%	+7%	+29%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	−12%	−16%	+60%	−12%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.9 kn	+3%	−3%	+47%	−30%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+3.4 kn	−1%	+26%	−68%	+12%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	−10%	−13%	−18%	−17%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	+7%	+5%	−0%	−14%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-yearBio blend	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	4,322	13,239	22,644	1,917	11.8	191	15.6	97%
2025Bio blend	CMA CGM SA	4,322	13,239	22,644	1,917	11.8	191	15.6	97%
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	6,298	19,559	36,722	2,709	13.6	172	15.5	98%
2023LNG / alt.	not published	5,058	14,647	34,224	2,441	14.0	148	12.0	98%
2022	not published	3,611	11,231	21,406	1,460	14.7	169	13.6	98%
2021	not published	2,383	7,509	14,578	933	15.6	164	19.6	98%
2020	not published	7,559	23,823	45,687	3,734	12.2	166	17.4	–
2019	not published	10,300	32,177	55,974	4,410	12.7	184	21.1	94%
2018	not published	9,660	30,166	56,181	4,345	12.9	172	24.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-yearBio blend	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	–	–	–	–	ABS	C
2025Bio blend	CMA CGM SA	15.6	16.3	−5%	1,051 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	15.5	17.5	−12%	849 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	12.0	19.4	−38%	537 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	13.6	19.1	−29%	610 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	19.6	17.9	+9%	971 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	17.4	17.6	−1%	882 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	21.1	18.9	+11%	1,005 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	24.5	20.2	+21%	1,028 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.