Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

IJBORG

IMO: 9456721
Type: General cargo ship
Port of registry: Delfzijl
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.45 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: JAN VAN GENT

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Favoriet Shipmanagement BV

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

53.1 kg/nm

General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (+50%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

18.73

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.45 (−26%)

Average speed

10.6 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

13.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,473 t

CO₂ emitted

7,849 t

7,971 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

46,570 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,401 h

183 days, 50% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 53.1 kg/nm · median 35.3 (+50%)

17.4Ranks 1,913 of 2,706, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 10.6 kn · median 9.3 (+14%)

7.0Faster than 74% of general cargo ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 18.73 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.45 (−26%)

10.14Ranks 698 of 2,706, lowest first52.37

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU52%
Into the EU39%
At berth in the EU2%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,198 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

IJBORG
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.070.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

IJBORG
General cargo median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

IJBORG
General cargo median

0.020,00040,00060,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	−1%	+1%	+218%	−21%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	−5%	+0%	−38%	−45%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.7 kn	−12%	−25%	−27%	+86%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	+10%	+6%	−3%	−12%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.5 kn	+9%	+5%	−5%	+30%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	−10%	−9%	+28%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.0 kn	−7%	+2%	−35%	−100%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Favoriet Shipmanagement BV	2,473	7,849	46,570	4,401	10.6	53.1	–	–
2024	Favoriet Shipmanagement BV	782	2,480	14,623	1,401	10.4	53.5	–	–
2023	not published	1,317	4,160	23,405	2,363	9.9	56.3	–	–
2022	not published	2,055	6,492	32,035	2,754	11.6	64.2	–	–
2021	not published	1,924	6,079	32,903	2,737	12.0	58.5	–	–
2020	not published	1,867	5,906	34,710	2,776	12.5	53.8	–	–
2019	not published	1,623	5,111	27,087	2,199	12.3	59.9	–	–
2018	not published	2,666	8,382	41,376	3,674	11.3	64.4	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Favoriet Shipmanagement BV	18.73	25.45	−26%	698 of 2,706	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Favoriet Shipmanagement BV	23.83	19.25	+24%	742 of 1,111	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	43.50	20.67	+110%	952 of 1,045	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	23.44	21.57	+9%	584 of 1,034	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	26.73	22.70	+18%	761 of 1,142	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	20.57	24.50	−16%	396 of 1,167	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	19.81	24.96	−21%	340 of 1,154	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	48,667.27	24.89	+195,429%	1,043 of 1,044	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.