Navalyze · Container · Ship

CSCL JUPITER

IMO: 9467263
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 81,455 t
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.67 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Oil blended with biofuel or another alternative fuel

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd. · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 104,201 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

346

Container median 172 kg/nm (+101%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−41%)

Average speed

17.2 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+23%)

Fuel per day at sea

142.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

23,518 t

CO₂ emitted

73,364 t

Distance sailed

67,895 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,954 h

165 days, 45% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 320 kg/nm · median 177 (+81%)

78.8Ranks 2,069 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.4 kn · median 13.3 (−7%)

9.1Faster than 36% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−26%)

7.22Ranks 797 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports16%
From the EU51%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,196 t

1.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CSCL JUPITER
Container median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CSCL JUPITER
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CSCL JUPITER
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.2 kn	−9%	−17%	−18%	+22%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	+16%	+17%	+35%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−3.3 kn	−19%	−35%	−44%	−16%	3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+2.6 kn	−10%	+7%	−2%	−10%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−3.0 kn	+20%	−0%	−2%	+29%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.7 kn	+28%	+23%	+150%	+29%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 28%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	−23%	−25%	+116%	−22%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 23%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025Bio blend	Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd.	12,880	39,645	40,257	3,244	12.4	320	12.1	–
2024	Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd.	17,192	53,401	48,837	3,584	13.6	352	9.87	–
2023	not published	11,005	34,441	36,237	2,688	13.5	304	10.2	–
2022	not published	24,445	76,191	65,207	3,875	16.8	375	12.1	–
2021	not published	27,680	86,362	66,624	4,676	14.2	416	13.4	–
2020	not published	23,518	73,364	67,895	3,954	17.2	346	10.4	–
2019	not published	7,322	22,827	27,122	1,518	17.9	270	8.05	–
2018	not published	4,388	13,693	12,563	679	18.5	349	10.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025Bio blend	Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd.	12.1	16.3	−26%	797 of 2,208	China Classification Society	A
2024	Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd.	9.87	17.5	−44%	442 of 1,974	China Classification Society	A
2023	not published	10.2	19.4	−48%	399 of 1,899	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	12.1	19.1	−37%	484 of 1,825	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	13.4	17.9	−25%	581 of 1,781	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	10.4	17.6	−41%	406 of 1,797	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	8.05	18.9	−57%	193 of 1,788	China Classification Society	A
2018	not published	10.3	20.2	−49%	286 of 1,705	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.