Navalyze · Container · Ship

CSCL MARS

IMO: 9467287
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 92,892 t
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.67 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Oil blended with biofuel or another alternative fuel

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd. · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 106,625 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

354

Container median 174 kg/nm (+103%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−45%)

Average speed

16.7 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+22%)

Fuel per day at sea

141.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

26,836 t

CO₂ emitted

83,753 t

Distance sailed

75,747 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,544 h

189 days, 52% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 312 kg/nm · median 177 (+76%)

78.8Ranks 2,034 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.6 kn · median 13.3 (+10%)

9.1Faster than 70% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−37%)

7.22Ranks 607 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports30%
From the EU37%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,524 t

1.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CSCL MARS
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CSCL MARS
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CSCL MARS
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.8 kn	−8%	−13%	+8%	−6%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	+4%	+5%	+2%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+1.4 kn	−0%	+10%	−32%	+11%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.7 kn	−9%	−19%	−9%	−13%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.4 kn	+2%	−7%	+39%	+10%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	−0%	+1%	−22%	+6%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	+4%	+2%	−6%	–	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025Bio blend	Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd.	17,395	53,494	55,747	3,822	14.6	312	10.3	–
2024	Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd.	17,451	54,365	51,406	3,344	15.4	340	11.0	–
2023	not published	16,493	51,485	50,632	3,327	15.2	326	11.8	–
2022	not published	24,226	75,654	74,320	5,369	13.8	326	10.6	–
2021	not published	29,426	91,804	82,001	5,304	15.5	359	12.2	–
2020	not published	20,749	64,730	58,826	3,484	16.9	353	11.0	–
2019	not published	26,836	83,753	75,747	4,544	16.7	354	10.4	–
2018	not published	27,302	85,125	80,406	4,693	17.1	340	0.98	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025Bio blend	Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd.	10.3	16.3	−37%	607 of 2,208	China Classification Society	A
2024	Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd.	11.0	17.5	−37%	519 of 1,974	China Classification Society	A
2023	not published	11.8	19.4	−39%	515 of 1,899	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	10.6	19.1	−45%	361 of 1,825	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	12.2	17.9	−32%	479 of 1,781	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	11.0	17.6	−37%	444 of 1,797	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	10.4	18.9	−45%	347 of 1,788	China Classification Society	A
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.