Navalyze · Container · Ship

CSCL SATURN

IMO: 9467299
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 93,770 t
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong, China
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.67 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd. · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 94,398 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

318

Container median 186 kg/nm (+71%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (−41%)

Average speed

18.3 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (+30%)

Fuel per day at sea

139.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

17,680 t

CO₂ emitted

55,106 t

Distance sailed

55,544 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,034 h

126 days, 35% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 311 kg/nm · median 177 (+76%)

78.8Ranks 2,027 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.3 kn · median 13.3 (+15%)

9.1Faster than 80% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−37%)

7.22Ranks 603 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports11%
From the EU44%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,036 t

1.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CSCL SATURN
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CSCL SATURN
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CSCL SATURN
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.9 kn	+2%	+8%	−8%	−3%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	+0%	−1%	+11%	+0%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	−9%	−12%	−1%	−2%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−3.2 kn	+5%	−14%	+23%	+3%	3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.9 kn	+5%	+25%	+111%	+14%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	−9%	−11%	−2%	−19%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−1.5 kn	+10%	+0%	−51%	+24%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd.	21,455	66,556	68,911	4,514	15.3	311	10.3	–
2024	Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd.	22,768	71,065	74,666	5,176	14.4	305	10.7	–
2023	not published	20,597	64,226	67,549	4,630	14.6	305	10.7	–
2022	not published	22,714	70,968	68,076	4,516	15.1	334	10.9	–
2021	not published	17,680	55,106	55,544	3,034	18.3	318	10.5	–
2020	not published	7,973	24,876	26,336	1,710	15.4	303	9.21	–
2019	not published	8,897	27,805	26,865	1,696	15.8	331	11.4	–
2018	not published	16,496	51,426	54,792	3,158	17.3	301	9.22	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd.	10.3	16.3	−37%	603 of 2,208	China Classification Society	A
2024	Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd.	10.7	17.5	−39%	492 of 1,974	China Classification Society	A
2023	not published	10.7	19.4	−45%	435 of 1,899	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	10.9	19.1	−43%	387 of 1,825	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	10.5	17.9	−41%	365 of 1,781	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	9.21	17.6	−48%	318 of 1,797	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	11.4	18.9	−40%	424 of 1,788	China Classification Society	A
2018	not published	9.22	20.2	−54%	206 of 1,705	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.