Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

EUROCARGO TRIESTE

IMO: 9468906
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 5,996 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EIV 5.94 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: FINNSKY

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MALTA MOTORWAYS OF THE SEA LIMITED

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,691 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

147

Ro-ro median 107 kg/nm (+37%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

97.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 109 (−10%)

Average speed

17.5 kn

Ro-ro median 14.6 kn (+20%)

Fuel per day at sea

61.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,116 t

CO₂ emitted

40,925 t

Distance sailed

89,387 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,100 h

213 days, 58% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 136 kg/nm · median 105 (+30%)

56.6Ranks 197 of 235, lowest first145

Average speedThis ship 15.5 kn · median 14.4 (+8%)

10.9Faster than 66% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 70.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.2 (−25%)

47.4Ranks 65 of 235, lowest first297

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports95%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,194 t

5.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EUROCARGO TRIESTE
Ro-ro median

100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EUROCARGO TRIESTE
Ro-ro median

14.015.016.017.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EUROCARGO TRIESTE
Ro-ro median

70.080.090.0100110

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	−11%	−13%	−2%	−23%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.8 kn	+5%	−6%	+1%	−6%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.9 kn	−3%	+3%	+21%	+25%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.9 kn	+5%	+12%	−11%	+1%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	−8%	−10%	−6%	−12%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.7 kn	+2%	−2%	−9%	+18%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.4 kn	+1%	+4%	+21%	−13%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MALTA MOTORWAYS OF THE SEA LIMITED	12,046	37,604	88,412	5,722	15.5	136	70.9	–
2024part-year	Finnlines Plc	9,242	28,852	61,491	4,003	15.4	150	98.3	–
2024	MALTA MOTORWAYS OF THE SEA LIMITED	13,841	43,197	90,195	5,733	15.7	154	91.8	–
2023	not published	13,116	40,925	89,387	5,100	17.5	147	97.6	–
2022	not published	11,175	34,953	74,148	4,469	16.6	151	78.3	–
2021	not published	11,922	37,312	83,350	5,325	15.7	143	77.8	–
2020	not published	13,660	42,715	88,203	5,471	16.1	155	87.9	–
2019	not published	14,681	45,895	96,472	5,746	16.8	152	74.4	–
2018	not published	11,983	37,450	79,789	4,870	16.4	150	85.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MALTA MOTORWAYS OF THE SEA LIMITED	70.9	95.2	−25%	65 of 235	RINA	A
2024part-year	Finnlines Plc	–	–	–	–	RINA	B
2024	MALTA MOTORWAYS OF THE SEA LIMITED	91.8	97.5	−6%	98 of 220	RINA	A
2023	not published	97.6	109	−10%	101 of 221	RINA	B
2022	not published	78.3	90.6	−14%	79 of 223	RINA	A
2021	not published	77.8	104	−25%	74 of 219	RINA	–
2020	not published	87.9	103	−14%	90 of 238	RINA	A+B
2019	not published	74.4	90.9	−18%	83 of 271	RINA	A
2018	not published	85.5	91.0	−6%	116 of 260	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.