Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

EUROCARGO VALENCIA

IMO: 9468918
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 6,347 t
Technical efficiency: EIV 5.91 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: FINNSUN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MALTA MOTORWAYS OF THE SEA LIMITED

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,347 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

164.3 kg/nm

Ro-ro median 104.6 kg/nm (+57%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

80.72

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 95.19 (−15%)

Average speed

14.8 kn

Ro-ro median 14.4 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

58.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,278 t

CO₂ emitted

41,412 t

42,064 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

80,835 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,450 h

227 days, 62% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 164.3 kg/nm · median 104.6 (+57%)

56.6Ranks 233 of 235, lowest first145.3

Average speedThis ship 14.8 kn · median 14.4 (+3%)

10.9Faster than 57% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 80.72 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.19 (−15%)

47.35Ranks 84 of 235, lowest first297.27

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports95%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU5%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (41,412 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.7%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.7 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

EUROCARGO VALENCIA
Ro-ro median

100.0120.0140.0160.0180.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EUROCARGO VALENCIA
Ro-ro median

14.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EUROCARGO VALENCIA
Ro-ro median

50.0100150200

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	+7%	+6%	−7%	−58%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	+3%	−1%	−9%	+12%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.5 kn	−4%	−13%	+6%	+40%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.4 kn	−4%	+5%	+18%	+78%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+1%	+0%	−14%	−12%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	−0.7 kn	+2%	−2%	−5%	+3%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	+2%	+2%	+16%	−14%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MALTA MOTORWAYS OF THE SEA LIMITED	13,278	41,412	80,835	5,450	14.8	164.3	80.72	–
2024part-year	Finnlines Plc	12,537	39,148	81,741	5,456	15.0	153.4	206.42	–
2024	MALTA MOTORWAYS OF THE SEA LIMITED	13,389	41,808	86,864	5,799	15.0	154.1	190.76	–
2023	not published	14,382	44,923	95,899	6,192	15.5	150.0	170.57	–
2022	not published	14,157	44,246	90,277	5,318	17.0	156.8	121.51	–
2021	not published	12,479	39,075	76,529	4,914	15.6	163.1	68.19	–
2020	not published	14,360	44,911	89,122	5,668	15.7	161.1	77.90	–
2019	not published	14,849	46,440	93,671	5,717	16.4	158.5	75.63	–
2018	not published	12,503	39,070	80,598	4,905	16.4	155.1	87.61	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MALTA MOTORWAYS OF THE SEA LIMITED	80.72	95.19	−15%	84 of 235	RINA	A
2024part-year	Finnlines Plc	–	–	–	–	RINA	B
2024	MALTA MOTORWAYS OF THE SEA LIMITED	190.76	97.53	+96%	173 of 220	RINA	A
2023	not published	170.57	108.62	+57%	158 of 221	RINA	B
2022	not published	121.51	90.62	+34%	144 of 223	RINA	A+B
2021	not published	68.19	103.64	−34%	56 of 219	RINA	–
2020	not published	77.90	102.77	−24%	76 of 238	RINA	A+B
2019	not published	75.63	90.89	−17%	88 of 271	RINA	A+B
2018	not published	87.61	91.03	−4%	121 of 260	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.