Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

EUROCARGO VALENCIA

IMO: 9468918
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 6,347 t
Flag (estimated): Finland (from the 2024 report)
Technical efficiency: EIV 5.91 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: FINNSUN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MALTA MOTORWAYS OF THE SEA LIMITED

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,033 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

157

Ro-ro median 110 kg/nm (+42%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

122

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 90.6 (+34%)

Average speed

17.0 kn

Ro-ro median 14.6 kn (+16%)

Fuel per day at sea

63.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,157 t

CO₂ emitted

44,246 t

Distance sailed

90,277 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,318 h

222 days, 61% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 164 kg/nm · median 105 (+57%)

56.6Ranks 233 of 235, lowest first145

Average speedThis ship 14.8 kn · median 14.4 (+3%)

10.9Faster than 57% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 80.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.2 (−15%)

47.4Ranks 84 of 235, lowest first297

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports95%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,420 t

5.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EUROCARGO VALENCIA
Ro-ro median

100.0120.0140.0160.0180.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EUROCARGO VALENCIA
Ro-ro median

14.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EUROCARGO VALENCIA
Ro-ro median

50.0100150200

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	+7%	+6%	−7%	−58%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	+3%	−1%	−9%	+12%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.5 kn	−4%	−13%	+6%	+40%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.4 kn	−4%	+5%	+18%	+78%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+1%	+0%	−14%	−12%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	−0.7 kn	+2%	−2%	−5%	+3%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	+2%	+2%	+16%	−14%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MALTA MOTORWAYS OF THE SEA LIMITED	13,278	41,412	80,835	5,450	14.8	164	80.7	–
2024part-year	Finnlines Plc	12,537	39,148	81,741	5,456	15.0	153	206	–
2024	MALTA MOTORWAYS OF THE SEA LIMITED	13,389	41,808	86,864	5,799	15.0	154	191	–
2023	not published	14,382	44,923	95,899	6,192	15.5	150	171	–
2022	not published	14,157	44,246	90,277	5,318	17.0	157	122	–
2021	not published	12,479	39,075	76,529	4,914	15.6	163	68.2	–
2020	not published	14,360	44,911	89,122	5,668	15.7	161	77.9	–
2019	not published	14,849	46,440	93,671	5,717	16.4	159	75.6	–
2018	not published	12,503	39,070	80,598	4,905	16.4	155	87.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MALTA MOTORWAYS OF THE SEA LIMITED	80.7	95.2	−15%	84 of 235	RINA	A
2024part-year	Finnlines Plc	–	–	–	–	RINA	B
2024	MALTA MOTORWAYS OF THE SEA LIMITED	191	97.5	+96%	173 of 220	RINA	A
2023	not published	171	109	+57%	158 of 221	RINA	B
2022	not published	122	90.6	+34%	144 of 223	RINA	A+B
2021	not published	68.2	104	−34%	56 of 219	RINA	–
2020	not published	77.9	103	−24%	76 of 238	RINA	A+B
2019	not published	75.6	90.9	−17%	88 of 271	RINA	A+B
2018	not published	87.6	91.0	−4%	121 of 260	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.