Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

MINA LONDON

IMO: 9489974
Type: Bulk carrier
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.24 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: NORDIC LONDON

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Q Shipping B.V.

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 26,135 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

89.2

Bulk carrier median 86.5 kg/nm (+3%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.24 (+31%)

Average speed

10.9 kn

Bulk carrier median 11.1 kn (−2%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,265 t

CO₂ emitted

3,997 t

Distance sailed

14,175 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,304 h

54 days, 15% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 63.1 kg/nm · median 84.6 (−25%)

61.8Ranks 358 of 3,089, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 11.0 kn · median 10.6 (+4%)

8.8Faster than 65% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.70 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (−5%)

4.85Ranks 1,381 of 3,089, lowest first15.8

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU17%
Into the EU78%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

114 t

2.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MINA LONDON
Bulk carrier median

60.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MINA LONDON
Bulk carrier median

8.09.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MINA LONDON
Bulk carrier median

0.010.020.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	–	–	–	–	–
2023→2024	+1.9 kn	−32%	−18%	−30%	−42%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 32%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−3.2 kn	+11%	−18%	+583%	−55%	3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+0%	+0%	−59%	+236%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	+1.4 kn	−6%	+6%	−49%	−18%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+2.3 kn	−17%	+5%	−21%	−45%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.9 kn	+9%	−1%	+97%	+36%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Q Shipping B.V.	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024part-year	NORDIC HAMBURG SHIPMGMT HK LTD	379	1,197	5,843	516	11.3	64.8	7.19	92%
2024	Q Shipping B.V.	907	2,843	14,366	1,304	11.0	63.1	7.70	80%
2023	not published	1,918	6,069	20,620	2,264	9.1	93.0	13.3	75%
2022	not published	253	789	3,017	246	12.3	83.9	29.6	49%
2021	not published	610	1,927	7,287	593	12.3	83.7	8.81	99%
2020	not published	1,265	3,997	14,175	1,304	10.9	89.2	10.8	–
2019	not published	1,918	6,025	17,868	2,073	8.6	107	19.6	–
2018	not published	898	2,813	9,089	959	9.5	98.8	14.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Q Shipping B.V.	–	–	–	–	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2024part-year	NORDIC HAMBURG SHIPMGMT HK LTD	–	–	–	–	ABS	A
2024	Q Shipping B.V.	7.70	8.09	−5%	1,381 of 3,089	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2023	not published	13.3	8.27	+61%	2,945 of 3,548	ABS	A
2022	not published	29.6	8.71	+240%	3,885 of 3,968	ABS	B
2021	not published	8.81	8.57	+3%	1,837 of 3,466	ABS	B
2020	not published	10.8	8.24	+31%	2,334 of 3,150	ABS	B
2019	not published	19.6	8.38	+134%	3,182 of 3,360	ABS	B
2018	not published	14.4	8.50	+70%	2,951 of 3,384	ABS	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.