Navalyze

Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

JIN ZHU HAI

IMO
9494383
Type
Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried
38,485 t
Flag (estimated)
China
Port of registry
Tianjin
Technical efficiency
EEXI 3.60 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD · part of COSCO Shipping

?
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 52,636 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
103
Bulk carrier median 91.2 kg/nm (+13%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
6.15
g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.38 (−27%)
Average speed
10.7 kn
Bulk carrier median 10.3 kn (+4%)
Fuel per day at sea
26.5 t/day
Fuel consumed
630 t
CO₂ emitted
1,975 t
Distance sailed
6,101 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
570 h
24 days, 7% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 84.8 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+3%)
61.0Ranks 1,972 of 3,611, lowest first114
Average speedThis ship 11.4 kn · median 10.7 (+7%)
8.8Faster than 79% of bulk carrier ships11.8
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.86 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (−13%)
4.80Ranks 1,304 of 3,611, lowest first15.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU26%
  • Into the EU74%
  • At berth in the EU1%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
18 t
0.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • JIN ZHU HAI
  • Bulk carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • JIN ZHU HAI
  • Bulk carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • JIN ZHU HAI
  • Bulk carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025–––––
2023→2024–––––
2022→2023−0.9 kn+2%−6%+290%−3%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+0.9 kn−5%+4%−68%−24%0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021–––––
2019→2020–––––
2018→2019−0.2 kn+0%−2%−53%+2%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD1,1053,44113,0331,14711.484.86.86–
2024COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD00–0––––
2023not published3,66511,45039,3243,67810.793.28.47–
2022not published9232,89410,07486911.691.78.73–
2021not published3,0589,62431,8152,98010.796.111.4–
2020not published00–0––––
2019not published6301,9756,10157010.71036.15–
2018not published1,3524,22413,0851,20310.91036.03–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmBulk carrier medianvs Bulk carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD6.867.90−13%1,304 of 3,611China Classification SocietyA
2024COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD––––China Classification SocietyA
2023not published8.478.27+2%1,856 of 3,548China Classification SocietyA
2022not published8.738.71+0%1,992 of 3,968China Classification SocietyA
2021not published11.48.57+33%2,648 of 3,466China Classification SocietyA
2020not published––––China Classification SocietyA
2019not published6.158.38−27%746 of 3,360China Classification SocietyA
2018not published6.038.50−29%660 of 3,384China Classification SocietyA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.