Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

JIU FENG LING

IMO: 9505443
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 7,404 t
Flag (estimated): China
Port of registry: Haikou
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.46 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 18,751 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

65.8

Bulk carrier median 91.2 kg/nm (−28%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.9

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.38 (+30%)

Average speed

12.1 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.3 kn (+17%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

505 t

CO₂ emitted

1,574 t

Distance sailed

7,678 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

635 h

26 days, 7% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 126 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+53%)

61.0Ranks 3,340 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 9.6 kn · median 10.7 (−10%)

8.8Faster than 20% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 54.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+585%)

4.80Ranks 3,532 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU0%
Into the EU100%
At berth in the EU0%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

0 t

0.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

JIU FENG LING
Bulk carrier median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

JIU FENG LING
Bulk carrier median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

JIU FENG LING
Bulk carrier median

0.020.040.060.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.6 kn	+98%	+87%	−84%	+408%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 98%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	–	–	–	–	–
2022→2023	–	–	–	–	–
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	+1%	−4%	−57%	+30%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+9%	+8%	−13%	−25%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.2 kn	+4%	−7%	+174%	+11%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	120	379	946	98	9.6	126	54.1	–
2024	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	386	1,205	6,053	593	10.2	63.8	10.7	–
2023	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2022	not published	584	1,824	7,806	761	10.3	74.8	11.8	–
2021	not published	1,358	4,282	18,275	1,700	10.8	74.3	9.09	–
2020	not published	1,439	4,506	21,056	1,936	10.9	68.4	12.2	–
2019	not published	505	1,574	7,678	635	12.1	65.8	10.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	54.1	7.90	+585%	3,532 of 3,611	China Classification Society	A
2024	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	10.7	8.09	+32%	2,274 of 3,089	China Classification Society	A
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	11.8	8.71	+35%	2,960 of 3,968	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	9.09	8.57	+6%	1,944 of 3,466	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	12.2	8.24	+48%	2,592 of 3,150	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	10.9	8.38	+30%	2,473 of 3,360	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.