Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

BETANCURIA EXPRESS

IMO
9557848
Type
Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated)
Spain
Port of registry
Santa Cruz De Tenerife

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Fred. Olsen, S.A. · part of Fred. Olsen

?
?

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
193
Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (+25%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
1,164
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 815 (+43%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
815
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 226 (+261%)
Average speed
28.1 kn
Ro-pax median 16.2 kn (+73%)
Fuel per day at sea
130.3 t/day
Fuel consumed
13,551 t
CO₂ emitted
43,443 t
Distance sailed
70,241 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,496 h
104 days, 28% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 203 kg/nm · median 150 (+35%)
69.3Ranks 330 of 408, lowest first232
Average speedThis ship 26.4 kn · median 15.8 (+67%)
12.0Faster than 96% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,686 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+198%)
66.8Ranks 373 of 408, lowest first1,569
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 471 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+86%)
48.6Ranks 271 of 408, lowest first1,247
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports99%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU1%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
591 t
1.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • BETANCURIA EXPRESS
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • BETANCURIA EXPRESS
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • BETANCURIA EXPRESS
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • BETANCURIA EXPRESS
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+1.7 kn−5%+1%+3%+28%1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−1.9 kn−1%−8%+22%+7%1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+1.1 kn+6%+11%−17%+0%1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022−2.6 kn+6%−4%−16%+6%2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021−0.9 kn−5%−7%−10%−12%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020−0.2 kn+5%+5%−22%+5%Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019+1.4 kn+1%+6%+6%−14%1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Fred. Olsen, S.A.12,44839,91061,4672,33326.4203––
2024Fred. Olsen, S.A.12,80741,06159,8552,42424.7214––
2023not published10,64934,14049,0821,84526.6217––
2022not published12,03638,58758,8312,31025.5205––
2021not published13,55143,44370,2412,49628.1193––
2020not published15,84450,79678,3702,70629.0202––
2019not published19,24361,692100,3313,43829.2192––
2018not published18,01657,75994,9333,41327.8190––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025Fred. Olsen, S.A.1,686567+198%373 of 408471253+86%DNVA
2024Fred. Olsen, S.A.1,318547+141%331 of 404908233+290%DNVA
2023not published1,234680+82%317 of 386955234+308%DNVA
2022not published1,232626+97%318 of 394948253+275%DNVA
2021not published1,164815+43%261 of 377815226+261%DNVA
2020not published1,322751+76%267 of 387988217+354%DNVA
2019not published1,260569+121%326 of 394935223+320%DNVA
2018not published1,459729+100%266 of 361–––DNVA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.