Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

EXPRESS 2

IMO: 9561356
Type: Ro-pax ship
Port of registry: Aarhus
Technical efficiency: EIV 1.56 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Molslinjen A/S

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

130.1 kg/nm

Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (−13%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

931

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (+64%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

39.37

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (−84%)

Average speed

25.5 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+61%)

Fuel per day at sea

79.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,968 t

CO₂ emitted

35,163 t

35,702 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

84,318 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,310 h

138 days, 38% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 130.1 kg/nm · median 150.2 (−13%)

69.3Ranks 137 of 408, lowest first232.4

Average speedThis ship 25.5 kn · median 15.8 (+61%)

12.0Faster than 93% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 931.46 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (+64%)

66.76Ranks 282 of 408, lowest first1,568.87

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 39.37 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (−84%)

48.59Ranks 26 of 408, lowest first1,247.19

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports97%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU3%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (35,163 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.6 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

EXPRESS 2
Ro-pax median

120.0130.0140.0150.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EXPRESS 2
Ro-pax median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

EXPRESS 2
Ro-pax median

0.0100200300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

EXPRESS 2
Ro-pax median

0.02,5005,0007,50010,00012,500

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−2.0 kn	+2%	−6%	−7%	−91%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−2.3 kn	−6%	−13%	+1%	+866%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	−0%	−2%	−12%	−5%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	−0.9 kn	−2%	−5%	+8%	−6%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	+1%	+2%	+7%	−3%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	−3%	−4%	−6%	+17%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+1.1 kn	+1%	+4%	+27%	+10%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Molslinjen A/S	10,968	35,163	84,318	3,310	25.5	130.1	–	–
2024	Molslinjen A/S	11,547	37,019	90,480	3,289	27.5	127.6	–	–
2023	not published	12,130	38,889	89,284	2,993	29.8	135.9	–	–
2022	not published	13,823	44,316	101,647	3,337	30.5	136.0	–	–
2021	not published	13,079	41,932	94,483	3,005	31.4	138.4	–	–
2020	not published	12,134	38,901	88,139	2,845	31.0	137.7	–	–
2019	not published	13,361	42,836	94,224	3,001	31.4	141.8	–	–
2018	not published	10,480	33,598	74,334	2,452	30.3	141.0	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Molslinjen A/S	931.46	566.51	+64%	282 of 408	39.37	253.18	−84%	Verifavia	A
2024	Molslinjen A/S	10,021.46	546.68	+1,733%	389 of 404	38.81	232.85	−83%	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	1,037.16	680.04	+53%	277 of 386	42.21	233.94	−82%	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	1,096.15	626.32	+75%	292 of 394	66.85	252.90	−74%	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	1,165.50	815.19	+43%	262 of 377	71.02	226.00	−69%	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	1,207.76	750.91	+61%	252 of 387	45.58	217.49	−79%	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	1,035.28	569.03	+82%	294 of 394	42.63	222.56	−81%	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	938.19	728.92	+29%	214 of 361	52.21	184.05	−72%	Verifavia	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.