Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

CAVALRY

IMO: 9588146
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 55,511 t
Flag (estimated): India
Port of registry: Mumbai
Technical efficiency: EEXI 2.81 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: BRIGHTWAY

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD. · part of Eastern Pacific Shipping

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 60,912 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

170

Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (+32%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.74

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.44 (+4%)

Average speed

12.2 kn

Oil tanker median 11.0 kn (+11%)

Fuel per day at sea

50.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

8,177 t

CO₂ emitted

25,568 t

Distance sailed

48,026 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,927 h

164 days, 45% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 185 kg/nm · median 129 (+44%)

76.1Ranks 1,469 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 10.1 kn · median 10.7 (−6%)

8.0Faster than 32% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+31%)

4.51Ranks 1,102 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU43%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

3,949 t

48% of all fuel; 52% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2,163 t

8.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CAVALRY
Oil tanker median

125.0150.0175.0200.0225.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CAVALRY
Oil tanker median

8.09.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CAVALRY
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.2 kn	+3%	−8%	+84%	+83%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.9 kn	+6%	−3%	−71%	−35%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.2 kn	−8%	−5%	−10%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	−4%	−0%	+186%	+9%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	−8%	−4%	−1%	+20%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.3 kn	+11%	+27%	+184%	+6%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.2 kn	+5%	+20%	−52%	−23%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.	4,730	14,819	25,571	2,539	10.1	185	10.4	65%
2025	Seven Islands Shipping Ltd	4,730	14,819	25,571	2,539	10.1	185	10.4	65%
2024	EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.	2,501	7,817	13,918	1,232	11.3	180	5.69	67%
2023	not published	8,177	25,568	48,026	3,927	12.2	170	8.74	48%
2022	not published	9,796	30,622	53,180	4,445	12.0	184	8.42	52%
2021	not published	3,581	11,205	18,611	1,619	11.5	192	7.73	52%
2020	not published	3,916	12,242	18,757	1,704	11.0	209	6.44	–
2019	not published	1,239	3,872	6,616	682	9.7	187	6.09	–
2018	not published	2,468	7,709	13,841	1,635	8.5	178	7.91	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.	–	–	–	–	ABS	A
2025	Seven Islands Shipping Ltd	10.4	7.95	+31%	1,102 of 1,665	ABS	B+C
2024	EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.	5.69	8.06	−29%	416 of 1,787	ABS	A
2023	not published	8.74	8.44	+4%	945 of 1,797	ABS	A
2022	not published	8.42	8.51	−1%	963 of 1,961	ABS	A
2021	not published	7.73	8.86	−13%	710 of 1,789	ABS	A
2020	not published	6.44	9.03	−29%	447 of 1,870	ABS	A
2019	not published	6.09	8.83	−31%	438 of 1,919	Lloyd's Register	A
2018	not published	7.91	8.86	−11%	726 of 1,779	Lloyd's Register	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.