Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.
Ships48
CO₂ emitted730 kt+11.8%
Fuel per mile153 kg/nm
Average speed12.1 kn
CO₂ at berth5.0%
Ships burning LNG9
Main segmentContainer

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Container

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3

  • EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.7.5 (−54%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.137.5−54%21014.83,1122.3%7
Segment median 16.30%

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0

  • EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.7.0 (−12%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.217.0−12%14010.43,1717.7%2
Segment median 8.00%

Gas carrier (LPG)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.6

  • EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.21.4 (−40%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.921.4−40%8412.22,7256.8%–
Segment median 35.60%

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0

  • EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.8.1 (−46%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.38.1−46%7810.91,25510.2%–
Segment median 15.00%

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9

  • EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.4.3 (−45%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.24.3−45%13910.61,0602.4%–
Segment median 7.90%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.ABS (39), DNV (9)100%27%0%0%

EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
ONTARIO9744831Gas carrier (LPG)26.9 g CO₂/t·nm20.9+29%13.48,575 t€243k
FAIRWAY9590319Oil tanker12.0 g CO₂/t·nm10.4+16%9.915,022 t€453k
SUNRISEWAY9907665Oil tanker7.2 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+15%10.621,575 t€615k
NORTH SEA9760495Oil tanker9.4 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+14%9.916,627 t€521k
INDIAN FRIENDSHIP9521394Bulk carrier5.5 g CO₂/t·nm4.8+14%10.45,607 t€177k
SILVERWAY9742912Oil tanker7.0 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+11%10.827,123 t€763k
CATALAN SEA9577044Oil tanker9.1 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+10%10.425,850 t€755k
STIKLESTAD9914644Gas carrier (LPG)23.1 g CO₂/t·nm20.9+10%10.813,750 t€506k
PACIFIC COBALT9788617Oil tanker11.4 g CO₂/t·nm10.4+10%12.13,846 t€130k
LEVANTINE SEA9815616Oil tanker6.9 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+9%10.717,038 t€500k
CMA CGM SYMI9867839Container11.2 g CO₂/t·nm10.3+8%15.29,608 t€292k
EMERALDWAY9907653Oil tanker6.8 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+7%11.112,384 t€350k
CMA CGM BRAZIL9860245Container7.6 g CO₂/t·nm7.1+7%16.219,323 t€537k
STARWAY9900801Oil tanker6.7 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+7%9.622,712 t€598k
MYKLEBUST9914632Gas carrier (LPG)22.1 g CO₂/t·nm20.9+5%12.714,357 t€464k
KAUPANG9914620Gas carrier (LPG)21.4 g CO₂/t·nm20.9+2%11.911,993 t€436k
YUKON9852145Gas carrier (LPG)21.0 g CO₂/t·nm20.90%13.311,864 t€327k
MANITOBA9738234Gas carrier (LPG)20.4 g CO₂/t·nm20.9−2%11.95,530 t€151k
PACIFIC BLUE9867798Chemical tanker11.2 g CO₂/t·nm11.5−3%8.61,865 t€74k
ATLANTIC JADE9892987Oil tanker7.6 g CO₂/t·nm8.2−7%10.314,488 t€473k
QUEBEC9744843Gas carrier (LPG)32.9 g CO₂/t·nm35.4−7%10.14,429 t€136k
CMA CGM HOPELNG9897755Container6.5 g CO₂/t·nm7.1−8%15.831,427 t€879k
CMA CGM BALILNG9867827Container6.5 g CO₂/t·nm7.1−9%15.347,068 t€1.2m
MAYA BAY9983401Container40.9 g CO₂/t·nm44.8−9%12.7961 t€26k
PACIFIC MOONSTONE9892078Oil tanker9.4 g CO₂/t·nm10.4−9%11.01,845 t€62k
PRIMEWAY9817626Oil tanker5.7 g CO₂/t·nm6.3−10%11.72,882 t€85k
ATLANTIC DIAMOND1022457Oil tanker5.6 g CO₂/t·nm6.3−10%10.913,715 t€378k
GREENWAYLNG9900796Oil tanker5.6 g CO₂/t·nm6.3−11%10.725,392 t€562k
SEGWAY1050959Oil tanker4.1 g CO₂/t·nm4.6−11%10.92,469 t€71k
CMA CGM UNITYLNG9897767Container6.3 g CO₂/t·nm7.1−11%14.954,602 t€1.5m

30 of 48 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.