Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2024

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.

EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.
Ships43
CO₂ emitted652 kt
Fuel per mile144 kg/nm
Average speed13.0 kn
CO₂ at berth6.0%
Ships burning LNG8
Main segmentOil tanker

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1

  • EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.8.1 (0%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.258.10%12812.13,2987.9%3
Segment median 8.10%

Container

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 17.5

  • EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.7.2 (−59%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.77.2−59%22516.82,7872.2%5
Segment median 17.50%

Gas carrier (LPG)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.8

  • EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.22.2 (−38%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.522.2−38%8813.02,3378.6%–
Segment median 35.80%

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1

  • EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.7.0 (−13%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.37.0−13%12211.87372.4%–
Segment median 8.10%

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7

  • EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.10.0 (−40%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.310.0−40%8012.69047.3%–
Segment median 16.70%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.ABS (43)100%21%0%0%

EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE. LTD.: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
CASPIAN SEA9829095Oil tanker18.8 g CO₂/t·nm9.9+89%10.51,627 t€41k
INDIAN SOLIDARITY9626663Bulk carrier25.6 g CO₂/t·nm15.2+69%11.11,684 t€31k
INDIAN FRIENDSHIP9521394Bulk carrier7.0 g CO₂/t·nm4.9+44%11.35,009 t€77k
LIGURIAN SEA9577032Oil tanker11.9 g CO₂/t·nm8.4+42%11.414,646 t€277k
BRIGHTWAY9588146Oil tanker5.7 g CO₂/t·nm4.5+26%11.37,817 t€126k
SUNRISEWAY9907665Oil tanker7.5 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+19%12.115,881 t€256k
GOLDWAY9742900Oil tanker5.3 g CO₂/t·nm4.5+18%11.424,459 t€505k
TOKYO9377248Gas carrier (LPG)25.0 g CO₂/t·nm21.8+15%13.18,823 t€136k
FAIRWAY9590319Oil tanker7.2 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+14%12.524,660 t€487k
ROSS SEA9457593Oil tanker9.5 g CO₂/t·nm8.4+13%11.814,484 t€242k
SOLOMON SEA9760500Oil tanker7.1 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+13%12.54,178 t€69k
PACIFIC QUARTZ9573696Oil tanker10.8 g CO₂/t·nm9.9+9%11.77,278 t€128k
MAYA BAY9983401Container51.4 g CO₂/t·nm47.2+9%13.61,305 t€20k
EMERALDWAY9907653Oil tanker4.9 g CO₂/t·nm4.5+8%11.922,657 t€378k
INDIAN HARMONY9626651Bulk carrier7.0 g CO₂/t·nm6.7+6%12.73,343 t€53k
CARTIER9924857Gas carrier (LPG)23.0 g CO₂/t·nm21.8+5%13.53,650 t€66k
LEVANTINE SEA9815616Oil tanker8.7 g CO₂/t·nm8.4+3%12.328,534 t€472k
STIKLESTAD9914644Gas carrier (LPG)22.2 g CO₂/t·nm21.8+2%12.511,799 t€295k
CATALAN SEA9577044Oil tanker8.5 g CO₂/t·nm8.4+1%11.826,369 t€523k
CMA CGM UNITYLNG9897767Container7.2 g CO₂/t·nm7.1+1%17.137,047 t€590k
PACIFIC BLUE9867798Chemical tanker11.8 g CO₂/t·nm12.0−2%11.5878 t€20k
SILVERWAY9742912Oil tanker8.2 g CO₂/t·nm8.4−3%12.728,275 t€491k
CMA CGM SCANDOLALNG9859129Container6.9 g CO₂/t·nm7.1−3%17.854,632 t€896k
NORTH SEA9760495Oil tanker8.2 g CO₂/t·nm8.4−3%11.719,902 t€352k
QUEBEC9744843Gas carrier (LPG)20.9 g CO₂/t·nm21.8−4%14.02,424 t€38k
ATLANTIC JADELNG9892987Oil tanker8.0 g CO₂/t·nm8.4−5%11.422,035 t€537k
KAUPANG9914620Gas carrier (LPG)20.8 g CO₂/t·nm21.8−5%13.114,886 t€301k
DIAMONDWAY9742895Oil tanker4.3 g CO₂/t·nm4.5−5%11.816,609 t€280k
CMA CGM TENERELNG9859117Container6.5 g CO₂/t·nm7.1−8%17.437,005 t€585k
PACIFIC SENTINEL9862932Oil tanker9.0 g CO₂/t·nm9.9−9%11.89,355 t€148k

30 of 43 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.