Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

TAO HUA HAI

IMO: 9620504
Type: Bulk carrier
Flag (estimated): China
Port of registry: Haikou
Technical efficiency: EEXI 2.96 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 83,366 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

143

Bulk carrier median 92.4 kg/nm (+55%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

5.35

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.50 (−37%)

Average speed

10.7 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.4 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

36.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,071 t

CO₂ emitted

6,465 t

Distance sailed

14,496 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,360 h

57 days, 16% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2018

Set against all 3,384 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2018 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 143 kg/nm · median 92.4 (+55%)

67.9Ranks 3,056 of 3,384, lowest first141

Average speedThis ship 10.7 kn · median 10.4 (+3%)

7.4Faster than 55% of bulk carrier ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 5.35 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.50 (−37%)

4.87Ranks 460 of 3,384, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU28%
Into the EU70%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

160 t

2.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TAO HUA HAI
Bulk carrier median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’202020’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TAO HUA HAI
Bulk carrier median

10.410.510.610.7

’182018’202020’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work
2024→2025	–	–	–	–	–
2020→2024	–	–	–	–	–
2018→2020	–	–	–	–	–

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2020	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2018	not published	2,071	6,465	14,496	1,360	10.7	143	5.35	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2024	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2018	not published	5.35	8.50	−37%	460 of 3,384	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.