Navalyze · Container · Ship

OOCL FRANCE

IMO: 9622617
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 98,299 t
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.80 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 102,404 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

298

Container median 178 kg/nm (+68%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.08

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (−53%)

Average speed

14.4 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

102.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,977 t

CO₂ emitted

37,372 t

Distance sailed

40,192 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,795 h

116 days, 32% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 284 kg/nm · median 177 (+60%)

78.8Ranks 1,886 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.6 kn · median 13.3 (+17%)

9.1Faster than 84% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.95 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−45%)

7.22Ranks 457 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports20%
From the EU16%
Into the EU57%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

11,187 t

93% of all fuel; 7% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2,526 t

6.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

OOCL FRANCE
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

OOCL FRANCE
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

OOCL FRANCE
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	+4%	+3%	−5%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.1 kn	−1%	+6%	+208%	+8%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.3 kn	−8%	−5%	−35%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.7 kn	+1%	−10%	−8%	+3%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+2%	+1%	+13%	+0%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+2.0 kn	+1%	+15%	−12%	−2%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.6 kn	+5%	−6%	+62%	+2%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	21,632	67,072	76,237	4,884	15.6	284	8.95	99%
2024	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	21,873	68,174	80,436	5,082	15.8	272	9.42	99%
2023	not published	7,192	22,450	26,092	1,773	14.7	276	8.76	94%
2022	not published	11,977	37,372	40,192	2,795	14.4	298	9.08	93%
2021	not published	12,852	40,060	43,723	2,714	16.1	294	8.80	97%
2020	not published	11,167	34,823	38,775	2,389	16.2	288	8.79	–
2019	not published	12,563	39,194	44,013	3,098	14.2	285	8.94	–
2018	not published	7,402	23,081	27,188	1,720	15.8	272	8.74	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	8.95	16.3	−45%	457 of 2,208	ABS	A+C
2024	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	9.42	17.5	−46%	407 of 1,974	ABS	A+B+C
2023	not published	8.76	19.4	−55%	306 of 1,899	ABS	B+C
2022	not published	9.08	19.1	−53%	257 of 1,825	ABS	B+C
2021	not published	8.80	17.9	−51%	230 of 1,781	ABS	B+C
2020	not published	8.79	17.6	−50%	289 of 1,797	ABS	B+C
2019	not published	8.94	18.9	−53%	257 of 1,788	ABS	B+C
2018	not published	8.74	20.2	−57%	181 of 1,705	ABS	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.