Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

MARAN GAS LINDOS

IMO: 9627502
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Greece
Port of registry: Piraeus
Technical efficiency: EIV 6.16 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: MARAN GAS MARITIME INC. · part of Maran

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

246

LNG carrier median 323 kg/nm (−24%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

6.49

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.9 (−41%)

Average speed

16.1 kn

LNG carrier median 13.7 kn (+18%)

Fuel per day at sea

94.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,729 t

CO₂ emitted

30,189 t

Distance sailed

43,642 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,717 h

113 days, 31% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 312 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 286 kg/nm · median 205 (+40%)

148Ranks 240 of 312, lowest first328

Average speedThis ship 15.3 kn · median 14.6 (+5%)

11.0Faster than 73% of LNG carrier ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 9.77 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.39 (+32%)

4.54Ranks 216 of 312, lowest first17.3

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU51%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

368 t

1.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MARAN GAS LINDOS
LNG carrier median

200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

MARAN GAS LINDOS
LNG carrier median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

MARAN GAS LINDOS
LNG carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	−0.8 kn	+1%	−4%	−62%	+29%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2023	+3.6 kn	−5%	+23%	+183%	−32%	3.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−2.4 kn	+5%	−12%	−33%	+88%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.2 kn	+15%	+7%	−67%	−9%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024LNG	MARAN GAS MARITIME INC.	3,000	8,054	10,484	683	15.3	286	–	99%
2023LNG / alt.	not published	7,875	21,708	27,721	1,725	16.1	284	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	2,913	8,022	9,780	783	12.5	298	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	4,121	11,755	14,554	978	14.9	283	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	10,729	30,189	43,642	2,717	16.1	246	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024LNG	MARAN GAS MARITIME INC.	9.77	7.39	+32%	216 of 312	ABS	A
2023LNG / alt.	not published	7.57	9.10	−17%	134 of 355	ABS	A
2020LNG / alt.	not published	11.1	10.7	+4%	149 of 267	ABS	A
2019LNG / alt.	not published	5.91	10.9	−46%	19 of 248	ABS	A
2018LNG / alt.	not published	6.49	10.9	−41%	27 of 197	ABS	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.