Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

APL MEXICO CITY

IMO
9632210
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
70,333 t
Flag (estimated)
Singapore
Port of registry
Singapore
Technical efficiency
EEXI 10.00 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD · part of CMA CGM

?
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 64,548 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
242
Container median 165 kg/nm (+46%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
11.3
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−42%)
Average speed
14.2 kn
Container median 13.2 kn (+8%)
Fuel per day at sea
82.4 t/day
Fuel consumed
27,709 t
CO₂ emitted
83,243 t
Distance sailed
114,633 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
8,071 h
336 days, 92% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,974 container ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 277 kg/nm · median 167 (+66%)
78.9Ranks 1,629 of 1,974, lowest first302
Average speedThis ship 16.5 kn · median 13.5 (+22%)
9.6Faster than 94% of container ships16.1
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.5 (−30%)
7.33Ranks 634 of 1,974, lowest first51.6
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports44%
  • From the EU27%
  • Into the EU25%
  • At berth in the EU4%
Fuel burned laden
26,601 t
96% of all fuel; 4% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
3,546 t
4.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • APL MEXICO CITY
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • APL MEXICO CITY
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • APL MEXICO CITY
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2023→2024+2.3 kn+15%+33%−85%+10%2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−0.7 kn−5%−10%+87%+9%0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022−0.9 kn+1%−5%−12%−9%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+4.4 kn−1%+36%+31%−7%4.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020−2.0 kn−8%−22%+737%−50%2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2024CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD4,78714,95717,2621,04716.527712.396%
2023not published27,70983,243114,6338,07114.224211.396%
2022not published15,63649,35861,1534,10314.925610.396%
2021not published17,65855,76569,5744,40715.825411.497%
2020not published13,59242,94252,9344,62711.425712.3–
2019not published1,7735,5716,32647313.428024.695%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2024CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD12.317.5−30%634 of 1,974ABSC
2023not published11.319.4−42%469 of 1,899ABSC
2022not published10.319.1−46%341 of 1,825ABSA
2021not published11.417.9−37%424 of 1,781ABSC
2020not published12.317.6−30%527 of 1,797ABSC
2019not published24.618.9+30%1,110 of 1,788ABSC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.