Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

QI XIAN LING

IMO: 9656864
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 25,492 t
Flag (estimated): China
Port of registry: Haikou
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.27 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 24,914 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

84.3

Bulk carrier median 91.2 kg/nm (−8%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.38 (+26%)

Average speed

11.5 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.3 kn (+12%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,203 t

CO₂ emitted

3,761 t

Distance sailed

14,270 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,238 h

52 days, 14% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 63.9 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−23%)

61.0Ranks 513 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 9.4 kn · median 10.7 (−12%)

8.8Faster than 16% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.87 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (−0%)

4.80Ranks 1,795 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports8%
From the EU54%
Into the EU34%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

158 t

4.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

QI XIAN LING
Bulk carrier median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

QI XIAN LING
Bulk carrier median

9.010.011.012.0

’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

QI XIAN LING
Bulk carrier median

7.510.012.515.017.520.0

’192019’202020’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.9 kn	−3%	−12%	+83%	−19%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.7 kn	−13%	−18%	−35%	−1%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2023	–	–	–	–	–
2020→2021	–	–	–	–	–
2019→2020	−0.3 kn	−13%	−15%	−27%	+68%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	1,204	3,780	18,843	2,012	9.4	63.9	7.87	–
2024Bio blend	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	676	2,077	10,277	998	10.3	65.8	9.71	–
2023	not published	1,196	3,733	15,823	1,441	11.0	75.6	9.85	–
2021	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2020	not published	759	2,369	10,368	922	11.2	73.2	17.7	–
2019	not published	1,203	3,761	14,270	1,238	11.5	84.3	10.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	7.87	7.90	−0%	1,795 of 3,611	China Classification Society	A
2024Bio blend	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	9.71	8.09	+20%	2,060 of 3,089	China Classification Society	A
2023	not published	9.85	8.27	+19%	2,310 of 3,548	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	17.7	8.24	+115%	2,967 of 3,150	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	10.6	8.38	+26%	2,399 of 3,360	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.