Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

ONE AND ONLY

IMO: 9657868
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 30,085 t
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.72 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: WUHU, SIDER EVA MARIA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: V.Ships Asia Group Pte. Ltd · part of V.Ships

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 30,085 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

79.8 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−3%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.38

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+6%)

Average speed

11.1 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

953 t

CO₂ emitted

3,012 t

3,059 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

11,948 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,081 h

45 days, 12% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 79.8 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−3%)

61.0Ranks 1,603 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 11.1 kn · median 10.7 (+4%)

8.8Faster than 66% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.38 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+6%)

4.80Ranks 2,025 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU16%
Into the EU78%
At berth in the EU6%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,595 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ONE AND ONLY
Bulk carrier median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ONE AND ONLY
Bulk carrier median

10.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ONE AND ONLY
Bulk carrier median

0.025.050.075.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−10.6 kn	+21%	−38%	−50%	+2%	10.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+10.2 kn	+6%	+101%	+44%	+11%	10.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	−12%	−14%	+165%	−92%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	−5%	−10%	−47%	+1,177%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+20%	+22%	−28%	−6%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	−17%	−13%	+127%	−4%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.3 kn	−6%	+6%	−21%	−12%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	V.Ships Asia Group Pte. Ltd	953	3,012	11,948	1,081	11.1	79.8	8.38	–
2024part-year	Lydia Mar Shipping Co SA	1,252	3,936	18,576	655	28.3	67.4	8.54	–
2024	V.Ships Asia Group Pte. Ltd	1,568	4,933	23,867	1,097	21.7	65.7	8.19	–
2023	not published	1,027	3,232	16,563	1,442	11.5	62.0	7.39	–
2022	not published	442	1,377	6,250	532	11.8	70.7	89.77	–
2021	not published	871	2,718	11,734	948	12.4	74.2	7.03	–
2020	not published	1,010	3,173	16,370	1,348	12.1	61.7	7.47	–
2019	not published	537	1,679	7,215	623	11.6	74.4	7.75	–
2018	not published	715	2,259	9,081	879	10.3	78.8	8.81	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	V.Ships Asia Group Pte. Ltd	8.38	7.89	+6%	2,025 of 3,610	Lloyd's Register	B
2024part-year	Lydia Mar Shipping Co SA	–	–	–	–	RINA	B
2024	V.Ships Asia Group Pte. Ltd	8.19	8.09	+1%	1,575 of 3,089	Lloyd's Register	B
2023	not published	7.39	8.27	−11%	1,391 of 3,548	RINA	B
2022	not published	89.77	8.71	+931%	3,964 of 3,968	ICS Verification Services	A+B
2021	not published	7.03	8.57	−18%	1,005 of 3,466	DNV	C
2020	not published	7.47	8.24	−9%	1,260 of 3,150	Verifavia	C
2019	not published	7.75	8.38	−8%	1,425 of 3,360	Verifavia	C
2018	not published	8.81	8.50	+4%	1,814 of 3,384	Verifavia	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.