Navalyze

Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

QING FENG LING

IMO
9663702
Type
Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried
27,510 t
Flag (estimated)
China
Port of registry
Guangzhou
Technical efficiency
EEXI 5.27 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD · part of COSCO Shipping

?
?

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 27,372 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
81.7
Bulk carrier median 86.5 kg/nm (−6%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
9.39
g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.24 (+14%)
Average speed
9.4 kn
Bulk carrier median 11.1 kn (−15%)
Fuel per day at sea
18.4 t/day
Fuel consumed
952 t
CO₂ emitted
2,996 t
Distance sailed
11,656 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,243 h
52 days, 14% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 84.5 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+2%)
61.0Ranks 1,943 of 3,611, lowest first114
Average speedThis ship 7.5 kn · median 10.7 (−30%)
8.8Faster than 4% of bulk carrier ships11.8
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.59 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+21%)
4.80Ranks 2,463 of 3,611, lowest first15.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports2%
  • From the EU58%
  • Into the EU34%
  • At berth in the EU6%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
180 t
6.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • QING FENG LING
  • Bulk carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • QING FENG LING
  • Bulk carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • QING FENG LING
  • Bulk carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−3.1 kn+19%−16%−40%+6%3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+0.1 kn−17%−15%−46%−22%Same speed, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−1.6 kn+0%−14%+46%+22%1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+0.7 kn−2%+5%−21%−18%0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021+2.0 kn+5%+28%+26%+24%2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020−1.8 kn+3%−14%−0%−31%1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019−1.1 kn+11%+1%+763%−6%1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD4641,4485,4897337.584.59.59–
2024COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD6522,0389,19886610.670.89.04–
2023not published1,4334,48016,8951,61210.584.811.7–
2022not published9803,07011,56895312.184.79.52–
2021not published1,2613,95614,6471,28911.486.111.7–
2020not published9522,99611,6561,2439.481.79.39–
2019not published9252,91411,6801,04111.279.213.7–
2018not published973021,35411012.371.314.6–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmBulk carrier medianvs Bulk carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD9.597.90+21%2,463 of 3,611China Classification SocietyA
2024COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD9.048.09+12%1,869 of 3,089China Classification SocietyA
2023not published11.78.27+41%2,707 of 3,548China Classification SocietyA
2022not published9.528.71+9%2,317 of 3,968China Classification SocietyA
2021not published11.78.57+36%2,700 of 3,466China Classification SocietyA
2020not published9.398.24+14%1,997 of 3,150China Classification SocietyA
2019not published13.78.38+63%2,873 of 3,360China Classification SocietyA
2018not published14.68.50+71%2,964 of 3,384China Classification SocietyA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.