Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

SILVER CINDY

IMO: 9682368
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 35,183 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEDI 4.04 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Columbia Shipmanagement (Deutschland) GmbH · part of Columbia Shipmanagement

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 35,183 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

95.3 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+20%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.54

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (−43%)

Average speed

10.5 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,074 t

CO₂ emitted

3,387 t

3,439 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

11,271 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,070 h

45 days, 12% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 95.3 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+20%)

52.8Ranks 1,094 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 10.5 kn · median 11.1 (−5%)

8.8Faster than 35% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.54 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (−43%)

7.93Ranks 209 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU69%
Into the EU14%
At berth in the EU10%

59% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,986 t).

Fuel burned laden

84%

16% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

10.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SILVER CINDY
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SILVER CINDY
Chemical tanker median

10.011.012.013.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SILVER CINDY
Chemical tanker median

7.510.012.515.017.520.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.1 kn	+27%	+15%	+11%	−27%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 27%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.1 kn	−42%	−36%	+173%	−1%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 42%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	+40%	+31%	−78%	+16%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 40%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	+34%	+26%	−63%	−4%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 34%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.7 kn	−49%	−52%	+309%	−40%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 49%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.9 kn	+49%	+61%	−35%	+105%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 49%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Columbia Shipmanagement (Deutschland) GmbH	1,074	3,387	11,271	1,070	10.5	95.3	8.54	84%
2024	Columbia Shipmanagement-GEU	763	2,410	10,145	876	11.6	75.2	11.73	49%
2023	not published	482	1,512	3,715	352	10.5	129.8	11.87	70%
2022	not published	1,530	4,796	16,533	1,462	11.3	92.5	10.21	66%
2021	not published	3,110	9,743	45,191	3,749	12.1	68.8	10.66	58%
2020	not published	1,478	4,638	11,052	864	12.8	133.8	17.77	–
2019	not published	1,513	4,737	16,890	1,424	11.9	89.6	8.66	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Columbia Shipmanagement (Deutschland) GmbH	8.54	15.04	−43%	209 of 1,460	ABS	A
2024	Columbia Shipmanagement-GEU	11.73	16.73	−30%	373 of 1,274	ABS	A
2023	not published	11.87	16.23	−27%	352 of 1,314	ABS	A
2022	not published	10.21	16.06	−36%	232 of 1,409	ABS	B
2021	not published	10.66	16.69	−36%	231 of 1,343	ABS	B
2020	not published	17.77	16.16	+10%	757 of 1,312	ABS	B
2019	not published	8.66	17.32	−50%	89 of 1,321	ABS	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.