Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

ECO MONEGASQUE

IMO: 9701011
Type: General cargo ship
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.42 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MONEGASQUE EPEE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: BRAVE MARITIME CORP. INC.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

66.6 kg/nm

General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (+89%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

10.31

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.45 (−59%)

Average speed

11.1 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+19%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,323 t

CO₂ emitted

4,178 t

4,243 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

19,877 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,786 h

74 days, 20% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 66.6 kg/nm · median 35.3 (+89%)

17.4Ranks 2,184 of 2,706, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 11.1 kn · median 9.3 (+19%)

7.0Faster than 81% of general cargo ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 10.31 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.45 (−59%)

10.14Ranks 284 of 2,706, lowest first52.37

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports25%
From the EU18%
Into the EU49%
At berth in the EU7%

66% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,768 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

7.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ECO MONEGASQUE
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ECO MONEGASQUE
General cargo median

8.09.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ECO MONEGASQUE
General cargo median

5.010.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	−10%	−7%	+72%	+29%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.4 kn	+17%	+3%	+67%	+26%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.9 kn	−6%	+2%	−55%	−20%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	−1%	−5%	+32%	+4%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.5 kn	+0%	−4%	−66%	−14%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.9 kn	+0%	+45%	+18%	+12%	3.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.6 kn	−3%	−25%	−12%	−14%	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	BRAVE MARITIME CORP. INC.	1,323	4,178	19,877	1,786	11.1	66.6	–	–
2024	BRAVE MARITIME CORP. INC.	854	2,700	11,525	1,070	10.8	74.1	8.02	–
2023	not published	440	1,392	6,919	569	12.2	63.6	–	–
2022	not published	1,029	3,254	15,267	1,347	11.3	67.4	–	–
2021	not published	785	2,486	11,567	974	11.9	67.8	–	–
2020	not published	2,298	7,274	33,875	2,740	12.4	67.8	8.97	–
2019	not published	1,945	6,081	28,690	3,370	8.5	67.8	7.98	–
2018	not published	2,294	7,182	32,753	2,961	11.1	70.0	9.28	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	BRAVE MARITIME CORP. INC.	10.31	25.45	−59%	284 of 2,706	DNV	B+C
2024	BRAVE MARITIME CORP. INC.	8.02	8.09	−1%	1,514 of 3,089	DNV	C
2023	not published	6.37	20.67	−69%	42 of 1,045	DNV	C
2022	not published	7.98	21.57	−63%	73 of 1,034	DNV	C
2021	not published	7.69	22.70	−66%	43 of 1,142	DNV	C
2020	not published	8.97	8.24	+9%	1,849 of 3,150	DNV	A
2019	not published	7.98	8.38	−5%	1,522 of 3,360	DNV	A
2018	not published	9.28	8.50	+9%	1,983 of 3,384	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.