Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

SHI LONG LING

IMO: 9712060
Type: Bulk carrier
Flag (estimated): China
Port of registry: Guangzhou
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.27 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 28,217 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

90.8

Bulk carrier median 91.2 kg/nm (−0%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.38 (+20%)

Average speed

9.7 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.3 kn (−6%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

880 t

CO₂ emitted

2,744 t

Distance sailed

9,695 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

999 h

42 days, 11% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2021

Set against all 3,466 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2021 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 80.6 kg/nm · median 91.4 (−12%)

66.4Ranks 1,068 of 3,466, lowest first132

Average speedThis ship 10.7 kn · median 11.5 (−7%)

9.7Faster than 26% of bulk carrier ships12.7

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.57 (+17%)

5.28Ranks 2,260 of 3,466, lowest first15.4

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU9%
Into the EU87%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

95 t

3.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SHI LONG LING
Bulk carrier median

80.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SHI LONG LING
Bulk carrier median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SHI LONG LING
Bulk carrier median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	–	–	–	–	–
2023→2024	–	–	–	–	–
2022→2023	–	–	–	–	–
2021→2022	–	–	–	–	–
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	−1%	−0%	−39%	+0%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+1.0 kn	−10%	−1%	+259%	−0%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.3 kn	−19%	−6%	+121%	−32%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2023	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2022	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2021	not published	1,722	5,404	21,357	1,989	10.7	80.6	10.0	–
2020	not published	2,843	8,900	34,809	3,261	10.7	81.7	9.98	–
2019	not published	880	2,744	9,695	999	9.7	90.8	10.0	–
2018	not published	490	1,531	4,385	522	8.4	112	14.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2024	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	10.0	8.57	+17%	2,260 of 3,466	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	9.98	8.24	+21%	2,161 of 3,150	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	10.0	8.38	+20%	2,251 of 3,360	China Classification Society	A
2018	not published	14.7	8.50	+73%	2,971 of 3,384	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.