Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM TANYA

IMO: 9722704
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 59,899 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEDI 10.40 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 85,016 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

258

Container median 174 kg/nm (+48%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.53

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−50%)

Average speed

16.7 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+22%)

Fuel per day at sea

103.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,665 t

CO₂ emitted

46,139 t

Distance sailed

56,948 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,411 h

142 days, 39% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,974 container ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 230 kg/nm · median 167 (+38%)

78.9Ranks 1,340 of 1,974, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.7 kn · median 13.5 (+16%)

9.6Faster than 85% of container ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.5 (−32%)

7.33Ranks 602 of 1,974, lowest first51.6

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports10%
From the EU37%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

14,093 t

96% of all fuel; 4% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,836 t

4.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM TANYA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM TANYA
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM TANYA
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	+2.9 kn	+5%	+29%	−24%	+9%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.7 kn	−21%	−8%	+227%	−27%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.8 kn	+3%	−12%	+5%	+7%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−3.6 kn	−1%	−22%	−90%	+34%	3.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	+5%	+3%	−2%	+10%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	−7%	−7%	+8%	−22%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	3,239	10,093	14,065	895	15.7	230	12.0	97%
2023	not published	4,066	12,683	18,536	1,445	12.8	219	11.0	92%
2022	not published	1,564	4,951	5,667	512	11.1	276	15.0	86%
2021	not published	1,443	4,560	5,381	416	12.9	268	14.1	92%
2020	not published	15,086	47,718	55,947	3,399	16.5	270	10.5	100%
2019	not published	14,665	46,139	56,948	3,411	16.7	258	9.53	96%
2018	not published	14,677	46,057	52,813	3,161	16.7	278	12.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	12.0	17.5	−32%	602 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	11.0	19.4	−44%	454 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	15.0	19.1	−21%	699 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	14.1	17.9	−21%	638 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	10.5	17.6	−40%	415 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	9.53	18.9	−50%	291 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	12.3	20.2	−39%	397 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.