Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

FENG DE HAI

IMO: 9727637
Type: Bulk carrier
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.93 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

–

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

–

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

–

Fuel per day at sea

–

Fuel consumed

0 t

CO₂ emitted

0 t

0 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

–

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

0 h

0 days, 0% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 89.0 kg/nm · median 84.6 (+5%)

61.8Ranks 1,813 of 3,089, lowest first119.4

Average speedThis ship 11.9 kn · median 10.6 (+12%)

8.8Faster than 90% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.67 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (+7%)

4.85Ranks 1,751 of 3,089, lowest first15.76

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

The voyage split is not in this year's report.

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

–

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

FENG DE HAI
Bulk carrier median

80.090.0100.0110.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

FENG DE HAI
Bulk carrier median

10.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

FENG DE HAI
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	–	–	–	–	–
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	+2%	−2%	−48%	+41%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	+4%	−0%	+168%	−3%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	−3%	−5%	−52%	−25%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+1.3 kn	−21%	−12%	+259%	−31%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	+1%	−3%	−60%	+29%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	+23%	+16%	−16%	+42%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 23%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	1,139	3,557	12,805	1,080	11.9	89.0	8.67	–
2023	not published	2,142	6,700	24,510	2,004	12.2	87.4	6.14	–
2022	not published	770	2,399	9,131	717	12.7	84.3	6.32	–
2021	not published	1,659	5,221	19,130	1,471	13.0	86.7	8.41	–
2020	not published	585	1,838	5,334	455	11.7	109.6	12.11	–
2019	not published	1,456	4,549	13,411	1,107	12.1	108.6	9.42	–
2018	not published	1,415	4,437	15,984	1,244	12.9	88.5	6.64	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2024	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	8.67	8.09	+7%	1,751 of 3,089	China Classification Society	A
2023	not published	6.14	8.27	−26%	816 of 3,548	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	6.32	8.71	−27%	845 of 3,968	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	8.41	8.57	−2%	1,646 of 3,466	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	12.11	8.24	+47%	2,580 of 3,150	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	9.42	8.38	+12%	2,076 of 3,360	China Classification Society	A
2018	not published	6.64	8.50	−22%	893 of 3,384	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.