Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

WESTERN MIAMI

IMO: 9743215
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 27,694 t
Flag (estimated): Philippines
Port of registry: Manila
Technical efficiency: EEDI 4.61 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC. · part of Victoria Ship Management

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 27,028 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

79.2

Bulk carrier median 86.1 kg/nm (−8%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.18

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.27 (+11%)

Average speed

10.0 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.8 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,891 t

CO₂ emitted

5,922 t

Distance sailed

23,867 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,376 h

99 days, 27% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 84.8 kg/nm · median 84.6 (+0%)

61.8Ranks 1,557 of 3,089, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 10.1 kn · median 10.6 (−5%)

8.8Faster than 32% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.65 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (+19%)

4.85Ranks 2,042 of 3,089, lowest first15.8

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports11%
From the EU16%
Into the EU70%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

1,734 t

92% of all fuel; 8% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

190 t

3.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

WESTERN MIAMI
Bulk carrier median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

WESTERN MIAMI
Bulk carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

WESTERN MIAMI
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	+7%	+8%	−51%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.1 kn	−6%	−15%	+173%	−40%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.2 kn	+15%	+17%	−58%	+92%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	−5%	−4%	−47%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+5.2 kn	−37%	+21%	+861%	−59%	5.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 37%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−5.6 kn	+66%	−18%	−81%	+77%	5.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 66%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC.	993	3,130	11,713	1,158	10.1	84.8	9.65	87%
2023	not published	1,891	5,922	23,867	2,376	10.0	79.2	9.18	92%
2022	not published	739	2,312	8,734	789	11.1	84.6	15.4	77%
2021	not published	1,520	4,773	20,732	1,900	10.9	73.3	8.01	94%
2020	not published	2,997	9,372	38,783	3,606	10.8	77.3	8.12	86%
2019	not published	496	1,560	4,036	726	5.6	123	19.8	71%
2018	not published	1,602	5,025	21,628	1,927	11.2	74.1	11.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC.	9.65	8.09	+19%	2,042 of 3,089	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2023	not published	9.18	8.27	+11%	2,108 of 3,548	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2022	not published	15.4	8.71	+76%	3,456 of 3,968	Bureau Veritas	C
2021	not published	8.01	8.57	−7%	1,449 of 3,466	Bureau Veritas	C
2020	not published	8.12	8.24	−1%	1,531 of 3,150	Bureau Veritas	C
2019	not published	19.8	8.38	+136%	3,185 of 3,360	Bureau Veritas	C
2018	not published	11.2	8.50	+31%	2,524 of 3,384	Bureau Veritas	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.